• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

EEOC targets third-party sexual harassment: Union pays $85K in latest settlement

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: July 17, 2023
2 minute engagement
EEOC: Employers and unions have obligations to protect against sexual harassment

Just days after announcing a $50,000 settlement to resolve a sexual harassment claim involving a customer, the EEOC issued another reminder that the agency is cracking down on third-party sexual harassment.

This time, the agency took aim at a union in Colorado.  And the third party was the union’s business agent. Here’s what happened:

Union’s agent crosses line, faces criminal charges

This case involved Teamsters Local Union # 455, a labor union located in Denver and Fort Morgan, Colorado, and a female union member.

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, the woman – a UPS manager – had a scheduled meeting to discuss grievances. At the meeting, a male business agent of the union sexually harassed the woman. Specifically, the suit asserted that the agent asked others to leave the meeting and then:

  • cornered the woman at her desk
  • closed the blinds, locked the door and propositioned her for sex
  • ran his hand up her thigh, and
  • proceeded to spread his legs and touch his genitals in front of her.

The agent later pleaded guilty to criminal charges stemming from the incident. As a result, he was sentenced to 18 months of probation, required to complete community service, ordered to issue a letter of apology to the victim and barred by a restraining order from contacting the victim.  

EEOC: Unions also have obligations to protect against sexual harassment

The union agreed to pay $85,000 to settle the dispute. Under a consent decree, it also had to:

  • Review and update its anti-discrimination policies to include a strong and clear commitment to preventing unlawful sex discrimination and harassment.
  • Provide training to its officers, agents and employees.
  • Post an informational flyer about workplace sex harassment at its Colorado office locations and on union bulletin boards at employer business locations where members are employed.

“It is important to remember that under Title VII, labor unions also have obligations to prevent workplace sexual harassment, and act promptly to stop any such conduct if it happens,” Amy Burkholder, director of the EEOC’s Denver Field Office, said in the agency’s announcement.

Info: Union Settles EEOC Sexual Harassment Case, 7/12/23.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

2026 Workplace Compliance Trends

Provided by Paycom

White Papers

Harvard Business Review AI Talent Playbook

Webinars

5 Strategies to Help Employees Understand Total Rewards

Provided by Paycom

White Papers

2026 Fertility Vendor Evaluation Guide for Benefits Leaders

Provided by Maven Clinic

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
When Clients Harass Employees, Is the Employer Liable? Court Rules

It’s a relatively uncommon type of Title VII claim, but it happens: An employee sues their employer based on alleged harassment not by a ...

  • Employment Law
Disability Discrimination: Manager’s ‘ADD Brain’ Comments Keep Claim Alive

Some manager mistakes begin with an attempt to help — and then land companies in court. In this case, a supervisor supported an...

  • Employment Law
Employee Seeks $256K in Penalties in Overtime Dispute

An employee who says his employer wrongfully withheld overtime payments has recovered about $3,700 for the alleged violation so far – but...

  • Employment Law
Race Bias Suit Produces $1.25M Payout: What Happened?

The EEOC announced that an employer it targeted in a race bias suit will pay $1.25 million and take other significant steps to end the liti...

  • Employment Law
Jury Awards $105K to Male Employee in Sex Discrimination Case

In Arkansas, a jury has awarded more than $100,000 to a male surgical technician who filed an EEOC charge alleging he was discriminated aga...

  • Employment Law
Huge holiday rush doesn’t excuse legal obligations under Title VII: Employer pays $25K

A recently shuttered restaurant has agreed to pay $25,000 and provide other relief to settle a Title VII lawsuit filed on behalf of an empl...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.