Skip to main content

Lessons in pay transparency so far, according to Reddit HR pros

AR

By

Last updated November 6, 20243 min read
Lessons in pay transparency so far, according to Reddit HR pros

As pay transparency continues to rise in popularity – even for states without legislation in place – HR is forced to adapt to new processes and procedures related to pay transparency. 

Since widespread pay transparency is still in its early stages, trial and error is the name of the game when it comes to pay transparency policies and strategies. Luckily, some HR pros on Reddit shared the lessons they’ve learned so far when it comes to pay transparency.

The rise of pay transparency

Although some companies have been transparent about salary for years, the pay transparency trend has definitely seen an uptick in recent years, which may be due to hiring in a state that has pay transparency legislation or utilizing it as a tool to attract the best candidates. 

As simple as pay transparency may seem from the outside, it can come with a lot of considerations for HR, such as how the range is calculated and the size of the range. Although it may tempting to pick a wide range to avoid having to iron out the details, posting an ultra-wide range can land you in hot water with potential candidates.  

For many HR pros, implementing pay transparency has been a long process of trial and error.  

Lesson 1: Stick to your salary range

The first step to any effective pay transparency strategy is to set the salary range for whichever position you’re hiring for. However, just figuring out that range can be difficult. Whether you want to post a true range, for the absolute minimum to the absolute maximum, or post within the min-to-mid range to leave wiggle room for negotiation, it’s important to stay true to your range. 

“The range is the range,” said one user. “Communicate clearly that X is the max and most candidates fall in the middle. Confirm that they understand this by asking if they still want to proceed, knowing this. […] When you make an offer, and someone pushes to go outside the range, you reiterate the max you already told them, and don’t go out of the range.”

“If someone pushed you over the max range, that should either mean you found an A+, can’t-miss candidate, or your range is low and needed adjusting to [the] market,” said another. “If it’s neither of those two things, then you just aren’t holding firm to your ranges and there’s no way to fix that other than doing it.”

Lesson 2: Proceed with caution when asking about salary expectations

First things first: Salary expectations are often tied to – and based on – a candidate’s salary history. Because of this, it’s important to check your state and local laws because many states either prohibit employers’ ability to ask about applicants’ salary history or limit the ways employers can use that information.

Advertisement

Beacon from HRMorning: HR department of one? Beacon reads the law. You make the call. Try Beacon free.

So if you’re in a state with those limitations, you’ll want to be very clear that you’re asking about the applicant’s salary expectation – and not their salary history.

But even if you aren’t impacted by such state laws, it can still be a tough call on whether to ask about expectations upfront.

Some HR pros are split on whether to ask for a candidate’s salary expectations upfront. While there are pros and cons to each side, all HR pros should be mindful of potential pitfalls.

Asking for a candidate’s expectations with salary transparency can move HR into tricky waters. It can lead to choosing salary based on a candidate’s expectations rather than skills and experience, opening the company up to potential bias claims or legal trouble. “What happens if someone negotiates above the range, and you have others who are of a protected class who you told that the maximum was the maximum and that was all they could get?” said one user. 

If possible, you may want to consult with a legal team on whether establishing salary expectations are beneficial for your needs or not.

Lesson 3: Set expectations with candidates before moving forward

Whether you discuss the candidate’s salary expectations or not, you should still establish mutual expectations when going forward in the interview process. This can be as simple as reiterating the salary range and confirming that the candidate is okay with this range. “During screenings, I tell them the wage or wage range and ask if this is acceptable. If they say no, then I let them know that this is the budgeted range and it’s up to them if they’d like to move forward,” one Reddit user said. 

Mentioning this early in the process can ensure the candidate and the recruiter don’t waste their time if expectations don’t align.

Filed underCompensation
Share

Further Reading

  • Wyoming UI Taxable Wage Base Rises for 2027

    Wyoming’s unemployment insurance (UI) wage base rises to $34,900 per employee in 2027, up from $33,800 in 2026. The $1,100 increase takes effect Jan. 1 and increases the wages subject to each employer’s assigned UI tax rate. The change doesn’t set an employer’s tax rate. All employers receive a base rate plus four additional rate […]

  • FLSA Compliance Guide 2026: Wage and Hour Rules for HR

    The Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division recovered more than $259 million in back wages for nearly 177,000 employees in fiscal year 2025, the most since 2019. The lion’s share – more than $184 million – involved violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  Federal wage-and-hour policy changed this year, too, affecting exemption […]

  • FMLA Eligibility: Do ‘Bonus Hours’ Count Toward the 1,250?

    FMLA eligibility usually looks straightforward: Employees need 1,250 hours of service in the prior 12 months. But the calculation isn’t always that simple, especially when bonus pay or shift differentials come into play. This well-established Sixth Circuit precedent – Mutchler v. Dunlap Memorial Hospital – shows how “hours worked” questions can end up in court. […]

  • DOL Restores Overtime Salary Threshold to $684 in Final Rule Update

    The Department of Labor (DOL) has finalized a technical amendment restoring the 2019 overtime salary threshold to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) following two federal court decisions that invalidated the 2024 rule. For HR and payroll teams, the amendment closes the loop on the litigation and confirms which federal salary thresholds govern exempt classifications.  […]

  • WNBA Agreement Puts New Spotlight on Pay Disparity: 8 Takeaways for HR

    You’d think a near-400 % pay increase for a group of women in the spotlight would finally ease the tension over pay disparity. But the “transformational” WNBA collective bargaining agreement might not spill over into corporate America as easily as a rim shot. The deal is a big deal: WNBA player salaries will range between […]