Skip to main content

Tornado victims sue employer: Were workers forced to stay?

TD

By

Last updated November 6, 20242 min read
Tornado victims sue employer: Were workers forced to stay?

In what may be the first of many similar suits to follow, a group of workers from the candle factory that was leveled by a devastating Kentucky tornado have sued their employer.

The group says the employer illegally subjected the workers to unsafe working conditions.

According to the suit, the first tornado warnings sounded at the factory at approximately 6 p.m. on December 10.

Instead of sending workers home, the employer told them they might be fired if they left, the suit alleges.

More Warnings, and Then …

The tornado hit at about 9 p.m. on the same night, as warning sirens sounded again. There were more than 100 people in the building at the time, the suit asserts.

The factory did not withstand the tornado’s force. Eight people were killed, and the plaintiffs in this case were injured.

The suit, filed in a Kentucky state court, seeks compensatory and punitive damages.

The employer has denied the suit’s allegations, saying employees were free to leave without threat of retaliation. And it says it has hired experts to review what happened and evaluate its emergency planning.

Federal law requires some employers, such as those that deal with hazardous chemicals, to develop an emergency action plan. Of course, it’s most prudent for all employers to have such a plan in place.

Do You Have a Plan?

So what does a good plan look like? What does it cover?

A good plan accounts for all emergencies that could take place at the workplace. It is based on an assessment aimed at identifying hazards that can lead to an emergency.

According to OSHA, a good plan includes, at a minimum:

  • Instructions on how to report an emergency
  • An evacuation policy and procedure
  • Emergency escape procedures and route assignments
  • Names and contact information for people responsible for providing further information
  • Instructions for those responsible for shutting things down before heading out, and
  • Rescue and medical duties, if employees have been assigned to perform them.

Don’t get caught off guard. If you have an emergency action plan, review it. And if you don’t, create one now.

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]