• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

New protected class continues to gain steam: Another state joins list on Aug. 7

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: July 14, 2023
3 minute engagement
Growing momentum: Another state poised to recognize new protected class

Heads up, Colorado employers: The Protecting Opportunities and Workers’ Rights (POWR) Act, which significantly expands workplace protections for employees, takes effect on Aug. 7.

The new law amends the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) by, among other things, making marital status a protected class.  

Notably, the POWR Act also lowers the bar to prove harassment claims and limits employers’ ability to state an affirmative defense to harassment claims, according to the Littler law firm.

Not a protected class under federal law

First things first: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on protected classes, such as age, race, religion, sex and national origin. But marital status is not a protected class under Title VII.

However, many states have passed legislation — like Colorado’s newly enacted POWR Act — that includes marital status as a protected class. In fact, about half of the states in the U.S. and the District of Columbia list marital status as a protected class, according to the Shouse California Law Group.

Marital status discrimination looks like …

1. Pre-employment discrimination

While marital status is not a protected category under federal law, the EEOC has clarified that asking about a candidate’s marital status (or parental status) can violate Title VII if the info is used to deny or limit employment opportunities.

Specifically, the EEOC said the following inquiries “may be regarded as evidence of intent to discriminate” when asked in pre-employment interviews:

  • A candidate’s marital status or plans to marry.
  • The name or employment status of a candidate’s spouse.
  • Whether a candidate is pregnant.
  • The number and age of children or future childbearing plans.
  • Childcare arrangements.

Let’s be frank though: All HR pros worth their salt know that direct questions like the ones above are obvious no-nos.

The problem, for many companies, is when hiring managers say things that come up in normal conversations – and then tack on problematic questions, perhaps without realizing that such inquiries cross a line and may violate a candidate’s legal rights. For example:

  • Your ring is beautiful. Is that an engagement ring? Have you set a date?
  • Oh, I know several members of the Smith family in Springfield. Is that your maiden name?
  • You mentioned that you enjoy traveling, which is really helpful for this job. If you are hired, how will your spouse feel about the amount of travel time required?  

These — and other seemingly innocent questions — invite legal trouble. That’s why manager training is so crucial. Employees involved in the interviewing process need training on appropriate questions to ask job candidates.

2. Employment discrimination based on marital status

Of course, state laws and municipal ordinances vary. But generally speaking, the following actions can amount to illegal discrimination if they are based on an employee’s marital status:

  • Denying certain benefits
  • Denying promotions
  • Making unwelcome or harassing comments
  • Requiring job transfers
  • Adjusting day and/or shift schedules
  • Withholding pay raises, and
  • Terminations.

Again, to HR pros, the list sounds fairly straightforward and obvious.

But many managers don’t know what they don’t know – and that often leads to mistakes. For example, when it comes to an employee’s marital status, a clear “danger zone” is when the person’s status changes due to life events like an engagement, a wedding, divorce or the death of a spouse.

As such, when an employee has a change in marital status, managers should err on the side of caution and consult with HR before making changes to the employee’s situation.

Even seemingly helpful adjustments – such as changing a newly divorced employee’s shifts to accommodate their childcare arrangements – can come back to bite the company if not handled correctly, so HR should be involved to ensure the situation is appropriately handled and documented.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

The Fundamentals of Benefits & Compensation

White Papers

Monthly Employee Engagement Ideas

Provided by Inspirus

White Papers

How a Delivery Service Provider Achieved HR Efficiency With Employee-Driven Payroll

Provided by Paycom

Webinars

Establishing a New Normal for Your Employees

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
FLSA crackdown continues: DOL targets child labor violations

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) continues its crackdown on FLSA violations. Last week, we told you about million-dollar payouts for wage...

  • Employment Law
Costly FLSA Mistake: Appeals Court Upholds $22M Verdict in Wage Dispute

The Third Circuit recently affirmed a jury verdict awarding more than $22 million in back wages to 11,780 employees at a Pennsylvania batte...

  • Employment Law
Equal pay dispute: Out-of-state remote employee wins first round in court

Scoring a significant preliminary victory, an out-of-state remote employee who lives and works in New Hampshire will be allowed to pursue p...

  • Employment Law
FMLA Policy Mistake – Bending the Rules Hurt Company in Court

This case highlights the importance of making sure managers follow company policies to the letter. When they don’t, it can lead to le...

  • Employment Law
Customer behaving badly: Company pays $50K to settle third-party sexual harassment claim

Your frontline managers probably know the company has a legal obligation to protect employees from sexual harassment from co-workers. B...

  • Employment Law
Equal pay settlement: What a $54M gender bias mistake looks like

Earlier this year, we told you that income-related equality was going to be one of the top employment law issues of 2023. Now, as the ye...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.