• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

New protected class continues to gain steam: Another state joins list on Aug. 7

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: July 14, 2023
3 minute engagement
Growing momentum: Another state poised to recognize new protected class
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

Heads up, Colorado employers: The Protecting Opportunities and Workers’ Rights (POWR) Act, which significantly expands workplace protections for employees, takes effect on Aug. 7.

The new law amends the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) by, among other things, making marital status a protected class.  

Notably, the POWR Act also lowers the bar to prove harassment claims and limits employers’ ability to state an affirmative defense to harassment claims, according to the Littler law firm.

Not a protected class under federal law

First things first: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on protected classes, such as age, race, religion, sex and national origin. But marital status is not a protected class under Title VII.

However, many states have passed legislation — like Colorado’s newly enacted POWR Act — that includes marital status as a protected class. In fact, about half of the states in the U.S. and the District of Columbia list marital status as a protected class, according to the Shouse California Law Group.

Marital status discrimination looks like …

1. Pre-employment discrimination

While marital status is not a protected category under federal law, the EEOC has clarified that asking about a candidate’s marital status (or parental status) can violate Title VII if the info is used to deny or limit employment opportunities.

Specifically, the EEOC said the following inquiries “may be regarded as evidence of intent to discriminate” when asked in pre-employment interviews:

  • A candidate’s marital status or plans to marry.
  • The name or employment status of a candidate’s spouse.
  • Whether a candidate is pregnant.
  • The number and age of children or future childbearing plans.
  • Childcare arrangements.

Let’s be frank though: All HR pros worth their salt know that direct questions like the ones above are obvious no-nos.

The problem, for many companies, is when hiring managers say things that come up in normal conversations – and then tack on problematic questions, perhaps without realizing that such inquiries cross a line and may violate a candidate’s legal rights. For example:

  • Your ring is beautiful. Is that an engagement ring? Have you set a date?
  • Oh, I know several members of the Smith family in Springfield. Is that your maiden name?
  • You mentioned that you enjoy traveling, which is really helpful for this job. If you are hired, how will your spouse feel about the amount of travel time required?  

These — and other seemingly innocent questions — invite legal trouble. That’s why manager training is so crucial. Employees involved in the interviewing process need training on appropriate questions to ask job candidates.

2. Employment discrimination based on marital status

Of course, state laws and municipal ordinances vary. But generally speaking, the following actions can amount to illegal discrimination if they are based on an employee’s marital status:

  • Denying certain benefits
  • Denying promotions
  • Making unwelcome or harassing comments
  • Requiring job transfers
  • Adjusting day and/or shift schedules
  • Withholding pay raises, and
  • Terminations.

Again, to HR pros, the list sounds fairly straightforward and obvious.

But many managers don’t know what they don’t know – and that often leads to mistakes. For example, when it comes to an employee’s marital status, a clear “danger zone” is when the person’s status changes due to life events like an engagement, a wedding, divorce or the death of a spouse.

As such, when an employee has a change in marital status, managers should err on the side of caution and consult with HR before making changes to the employee’s situation.

Even seemingly helpful adjustments – such as changing a newly divorced employee’s shifts to accommodate their childcare arrangements – can come back to bite the company if not handled correctly, so HR should be involved to ensure the situation is appropriately handled and documented.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Harvard Business Review AI Talent Playbook

White Papers

The True Cost of a Delayed Diagnosis

Provided by Maven Clinic

White Papers

The Open Enrollment Communication Toolkit: Every Message, Ready to Send

Webinars

AI Governance for HR Teams Without a Legal Department

Provided by TriNet

SPONSORED CONTENT

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Benefits

Staff Administration

sponsored content
PEO ROI: 3 Numbers to Know Before You Leave Patchwork HR

Courtesy of TRINET

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
JCPenney Settles EEOC Lawsuit Over Firing of Worker with Breast Cancer: $99K Payout

When employers outsource leave administration to a third-party administrator (TPA), legal responsibility remains with the employer – as a...

  • Employment Law
Can Company Fire Employee for Misconduct Tied to a Disability?

When an employee ties misconduct to a disability, HR has to weigh ADA compliance against policy enforcement. One misstep can trigger a laws...

  • Employment Law
Off-the-Clock Work and FLSA Compliance: New DOL Opinion Letter FLSA2026-8

A new DOL opinion letter addresses off-the-clock work, rounding policies, and the de minimis defense – and the conclusions should prompt ...

  • Employment Law
Return-to-Office Mandate Triggers EEOC Lawsuit, $64K Payout

About a third of companies plan to follow Amazon’s lead and issue a return-to-office mandate that requires workers to be in the office fi...

  • Employment Law
Nursing Rights at Work: New Lawsuit Highlights Employer Risk

When it comes to nursing rights at work, a Pennsylvania court just sent a clear message: Mishandling accommodation requests for pumping bre...

  • Employment Law
Business ignores $354K FLSA settlement agreement: DOL sues

Another company has tried to dodge obligations outlined in a consent decree, according to a new lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Lab...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | HRMorning Insider? Manage your subscription
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.