Skip to main content

An $11.25M mistake: Why jury sides with fired worker who complained about harassment

CW

By

Last updated November 6, 20241 min read
An $11.25M mistake: Why jury sides with fired worker who complained about harassment

A recent lawsuit provides a case study on what NOT to do when handling employee complaints. How bad was it? A jury awarded an eight-figure payout to a fired worker.

To avoid similar mistakes, download our Practical Tools guide on handling employee complaints.

Here’s what happened – and where the company went wrong:

Company fired worker who complained about harassment

Who was involved: Equinox Holdings, Inc., a luxury gym chain, and a Black fitness instructor who was fired from her job at a location in New York City.

What happened: The former employee’s lawsuit alleged a hostile work environment and unlawful termination in violation of Title VII and New York State Human Rights Law. Specifically, she said the company ignored her complaints about a co-worker’s racist and sexually inappropriate comments. Among other things, the co-worker allegedly made vulgar comments about Black women’s bodies, used racially offensive slurs and encouraged clients to work with white personal trainers. Rather than dealing with the co-worker’s misconduct, the company retaliated against the employee by firing her for her purported “lateness,” the lawsuit claimed. After a New York federal court refused to dismiss the claims, the case went before a Manhattan jury.

Result: The jury sided with the former employee, awarding:

  • $1.25 million in compensatory damages, and
  • $10 million in punitive damages.

The employee will also receive $16,000 in economic damages representing back pay, which was previously agreed to by the parties.

Info: Jury verdict in Robynn Europe v. Equinox Holdings, Inc., 5/16/23.

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]