• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Broken Foot: Workplace Injury Triggers $58M Verdict

Tom D'Agostino
By: Tom D'Agostino
  • Share on

About the Author

Tom D’Agostino is an attorney and legal editor who has more than 30 years of experience writing about employment law, disability law and education law trends. He earned his B.A. degree from Ramapo College of New Jersey and his J.D. from the Duquesne University School of Law. D’Agostino, who is a member of the Pennsylvania bar, is a past member of the American Bar Association’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities and the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Legal Services to Persons with Disabilities Committee. He has provided technical assistance in the production of segments for television’s ABC World News and 20/20, and he has been quoted in periodicals including USA Today. He is also a past contributing author of Legal Rights of Persons with Disabilities: An Analysis of Federal Law, which is a comprehensive two-volume treatise addressing the legal rights of people with disabilities. Tom is passionate about baseball and authentic Italian food. When not writing, he enjoys spending time with family.

Show Less
Last Updated: June 18, 2024
3 minute engagement

It’s not too often that a workplace injury as relatively minor as a broken foot leads to a multi-million dollar jury verdict.

But due to an unusual set of circumstances, that is exactly what happened in a recent California case involving a train yard worker.

In early February 2016, Pablo Scipione was called into work at around 2 a.m. to perform electrical repairs at a train manufacturing yard.

He was working as an independent contractor at the time.

A supervisor allegedly told Scipione that the work needed to be completed by 5 a.m.

Workplace Injury Started Small, But Then …

Scipione was not told and did not know that the train he was assigned to work on was wet. When he climbed to the top of the car, he slipped and fell, suffering a microfracture to his left foot.

At first, it did not seem that the workplace injury would lead to serious trouble. In fact, Scipione went back to work the day after he fell and continued working for more than a year.

But unfortunately, the initial workplace injury eventually led to much bigger problems.

He visited a foot doctor, had surgery, and was diagnosed as having a condition known as complex regional pain syndrome. He then became unable to work, he said.

Injured Worker Alleges Negligence

In his suit against the Japan-based transportation and manufacturing company Kinkisharyo’s International LLC, he asserted a negligence claim based on the workplace injury.

The case dragged on, and according to a media report about the case Scipione was willing to settle the matter for $3 million in 2022.

That resolution did not materialize, and the case went to trial.

The rail yard operator was reportedly unable to make a convincing argument that Scipione should have been limited to workers’ compensation remedies.

Instead, in late May a California jury said he should receive $54.15 in compensatory damages in addition to $4.2 million in punitive damages.

Lawyer: ‘It Was Bound to Happen’

“Kinkisharyo tried everything possible to downplay the severity of our client’s injuries,” said Scipione attorney and PARRIS Law Firm partner Alexander R. Wheeler in a release about the verdict. “The jury saw through their failed tactics and understood the pain our client deals with every day,” Wheeler added.

In addition to the problem of the allegedly wet train, there were also alleged problems relating to lighting that may have helped lead to the workplace injury.

“An injury this severe was bound to happen,” said PARRIS Law Firm partner Khail A. Parris. “Employees frequently complained to supervisors that the station was poorly lit, and yet nothing was done to ensure a safe working environment,” Parris added.

The firm said it presented multiple offers to settle in amounts that began at $8 million and ended at $3 million. It also said that pre-judgment interest will add more than $20 million to the amount of the judgment.

That interest becomes available when – as here – the defendant rejects a settlement offer and the plaintiff thereafter is awarded a greater amount at trial.

Under California law, the successful plaintiff can get 10% pre-judgment interest from the date of the first offer. Scipione’s lawyers say that they offered to settle as early as March of 2020.

Employees and Independent Contractors

Employers do not owe the same duties to independent contractors that they owe to their own employees.

Hiring independent contractors can result in significant cost savings for employers versus hiring employees. When employers hire independent contractors, there is no need to worry about payroll taxes and the contractor is not eligible for workers’ compensation benefits.

But as this case shows, the move does not absolutely insulate employers from legal liability if an independent contractor suffers a workplace injury.

Instead, an injured independent contractor may still pursue a negligence claim against the employer that hired them. This case shows that when independent contractors are hired to do a job, it is important for employers to provide a safe working environment for them.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Inspirus — The Mid-Market Retention Playbook: 5 Strategies That Work When You Can’t Just Pay More

Provided by Inspirus

Webinars

Five Reasons Your Onboarding Process Falls Flat

Webinars

Serena Williams and Paycom: A Conversation About Purpose, Success and Work Ethic

Provided by Paycom

Webinars

Upskill, Reskill and Retain: How to Future-Proof Your Workforce

Provided by PAYCOM

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Fired over a tampon: Jury awards woman $85K — then court tacks on an additional $258K

Even if a six-figure payout doesn’t make you cringe, the details of this lawsuit probably will. A woman in Virginia was fired for R...

  • Employment Law
  • Recruiting
AI Job Postings, Real Consequences: $9,460 DOJ Fine

Prompt. Generate. Post. That’s the new recruiting workflow for many HR teams turning to artificial intelligence (AI) to speed up job post...

  • Employment Law
Bicycle Company Settlement: Workplace Retaliation Claim Leads to HR Overhaul

A single retaliation complaint to the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) led to the overhaul of a company’s employment practices, i...

  • Employment Law
Feds to NJ employer: ‘That job termination violates the ADA’

A newly filed lawsuit says a New Jersey nursing home’s job termination of a longtime worker violated the Americans with Disabilities ...

  • Employment Law
Stroke Leads to Job Termination: FMLA Violation?

A federal court refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed by an employee who was fired after taking FMLA leave to recover from a stroke. The ru...

  • Employment Law
SHRM Update: Court Upholds $11.5M Discrimination and Retaliation Verdict

A federal court in Colorado rejected SHRM’s attempt to overturn an $11.5 million verdict for race discrimination and retaliation against ...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.