• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Broken Foot: Workplace Injury Triggers $58M Verdict

Tom D'Agostino
By: Tom D'Agostino
  • Share on

About the Author

Tom D’Agostino is an attorney and legal editor who has more than 30 years of experience writing about employment law, disability law and education law trends. He earned his B.A. degree from Ramapo College of New Jersey and his J.D. from the Duquesne University School of Law. D’Agostino, who is a member of the Pennsylvania bar, is a past member of the American Bar Association’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities and the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Legal Services to Persons with Disabilities Committee. He has provided technical assistance in the production of segments for television’s ABC World News and 20/20, and he has been quoted in periodicals including USA Today. He is also a past contributing author of Legal Rights of Persons with Disabilities: An Analysis of Federal Law, which is a comprehensive two-volume treatise addressing the legal rights of people with disabilities. Tom is passionate about baseball and authentic Italian food. When not writing, he enjoys spending time with family.

Show Less
Last Updated: June 18, 2024
3 minute engagement

It’s not too often that a workplace injury as relatively minor as a broken foot leads to a multi-million dollar jury verdict.

But due to an unusual set of circumstances, that is exactly what happened in a recent California case involving a train yard worker.

In early February 2016, Pablo Scipione was called into work at around 2 a.m. to perform electrical repairs at a train manufacturing yard.

He was working as an independent contractor at the time.

A supervisor allegedly told Scipione that the work needed to be completed by 5 a.m.

Workplace Injury Started Small, But Then …

Scipione was not told and did not know that the train he was assigned to work on was wet. When he climbed to the top of the car, he slipped and fell, suffering a microfracture to his left foot.

At first, it did not seem that the workplace injury would lead to serious trouble. In fact, Scipione went back to work the day after he fell and continued working for more than a year.

But unfortunately, the initial workplace injury eventually led to much bigger problems.

He visited a foot doctor, had surgery, and was diagnosed as having a condition known as complex regional pain syndrome. He then became unable to work, he said.

Injured Worker Alleges Negligence

In his suit against the Japan-based transportation and manufacturing company Kinkisharyo’s International LLC, he asserted a negligence claim based on the workplace injury.

The case dragged on, and according to a media report about the case Scipione was willing to settle the matter for $3 million in 2022.

That resolution did not materialize, and the case went to trial.

The rail yard operator was reportedly unable to make a convincing argument that Scipione should have been limited to workers’ compensation remedies.

Instead, in late May a California jury said he should receive $54.15 in compensatory damages in addition to $4.2 million in punitive damages.

Lawyer: ‘It Was Bound to Happen’

“Kinkisharyo tried everything possible to downplay the severity of our client’s injuries,” said Scipione attorney and PARRIS Law Firm partner Alexander R. Wheeler in a release about the verdict. “The jury saw through their failed tactics and understood the pain our client deals with every day,” Wheeler added.

In addition to the problem of the allegedly wet train, there were also alleged problems relating to lighting that may have helped lead to the workplace injury.

“An injury this severe was bound to happen,” said PARRIS Law Firm partner Khail A. Parris. “Employees frequently complained to supervisors that the station was poorly lit, and yet nothing was done to ensure a safe working environment,” Parris added.

The firm said it presented multiple offers to settle in amounts that began at $8 million and ended at $3 million. It also said that pre-judgment interest will add more than $20 million to the amount of the judgment.

That interest becomes available when – as here – the defendant rejects a settlement offer and the plaintiff thereafter is awarded a greater amount at trial.

Under California law, the successful plaintiff can get 10% pre-judgment interest from the date of the first offer. Scipione’s lawyers say that they offered to settle as early as March of 2020.

Employees and Independent Contractors

Employers do not owe the same duties to independent contractors that they owe to their own employees.

Hiring independent contractors can result in significant cost savings for employers versus hiring employees. When employers hire independent contractors, there is no need to worry about payroll taxes and the contractor is not eligible for workers’ compensation benefits.

But as this case shows, the move does not absolutely insulate employers from legal liability if an independent contractor suffers a workplace injury.

Instead, an injured independent contractor may still pursue a negligence claim against the employer that hired them. This case shows that when independent contractors are hired to do a job, it is important for employers to provide a safe working environment for them.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Is Your Employee Engagement Program Under Control? The Engagement Maturity Map

Provided by Terryberry

White Papers

Employee Recognition Playbook

Provided by Inspirus

White Papers

The Business Case for Maven Clinic

Provided by Maven Clinic

White Papers

Completion Rates Aren’t a Training Strategy

Provided by Navex

SPONSORED CONTENT

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Benefits

Staff Administration

sponsored content
PEO ROI: 3 Numbers to Know Before You Leave Patchwork HR

Courtesy of TRINET

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Retention Strategies: 5 That Work When You Can’t Pay More

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Sexual assault at work: McDonald’s franchisee agrees to pay $4.4M to teen worker

Last fall, the DOL announced that it would increase civil money penalties for child labor violations. And an egregious case out of weste...

  • Employment Law
Woman was paid less than man for same job: Here’s why it was OK

Sometimes, a person of one sex may be paid less than a person of the other sex in the same job for reasons that have nothing to do with gen...

  • Employment Law
No Accommodation for High Blood Pressure: Verizon Pays $115K

According to the American Heart Association, an estimated 122.4 million – or 47% – of U.S. adults have hypertension, more commonly know...

  • Employment Law
Can Company Fire Employee for Misconduct Tied to a Disability?

When an employee ties misconduct to a disability, HR has to weigh ADA compliance against policy enforcement. One misstep can trigger a laws...

  • Employment Law
  • Payroll
New Veterans Law Makes USERRA Compliance More Crucial

Employers should be aware the federal law that protects veterans and service members has been amended by a new law, making the stakes highe...

  • Employment Law
Here’s why this claim of sex-based pay discrimination fell short

One way to prove unlawful sex-based pay discrimination is to show that an employee of a different sex does a similar job but gets paid more...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.