• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Ex-employee seeks rehire, then files breach of contract suit: Court says …

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: January 9, 2023
2 minute engagement

A Georgia appeals court revived a former employee’s breach of contract claim against her former employer. Here’s why she got a second chance to prove her claim in court.

In 1999, Sandra Sigmon was hired as a teacher for the DeKalb school district. After the 2016 school year, she resigned. Two years later, Sigmon applied for re-employment with the district.

She then learned her application might be “red-flagged” because she received an unsatisfactory evaluation during the 2014-15 year.

Sigmon claimed the evaluation contained deficiencies and misrepresentations. She contacted several district officials in an attempt to have it revised. But the district refused her requests to revise the evaluation.

Breach of contract?

Sigmon then filed a breach of contract lawsuit based on the alleged deficiencies and inaccuracies.

The district filed a motion to dismiss.

The trial court granted the motion, finding Sigmon failed to exhaust administrative remedies based on a Georgia law that “grants local school boards the power to hear and determine any matter of local controversy in reference to the construction or administration of the school law, which would include hearing challenges to a decision not to renew the contract of a tenured teacher.” (Emphasis in original.)

Why Trial Court Made the Wrong Call

On appeal, a state appellate court reversed.

Here, Sigmon “was a former tenured teacher, but she gave up that tenured status when she resigned after the 2016 school year,” the court explained.

As a non-tenured teacher who did not have “the right to a hearing under [the applicable state law],” Sigmon did not need to “exhaust these administrative remedies before bringing suit in superior court,” the court held.

The trial court made the wrong call when it dismissed Sigmon’s breach of contract claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, so the appeals court reversed the ruling and remanded the claim.

Sigmon v. DeKalb County School Dist., No. A22A1311, 2022 WL 17173080 (Ga. Ct. App. 11/23/22).

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

Pieced Together Isn’t a Program: How to Take Control of Your Employee Engagement Strategy

Provided by Terryberry

White Papers

Budgeting for a Successful Rewards and Recognition Program

Provided by Inspirus

White Papers

2026 State of Leave and Accommodations Report

Provided by AbsenceSoft

White Papers

Employee Engagement Trends 2026

Provided by Inspirus

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
An $11.25M mistake: Why jury sides with fired worker who complained about harassment

A recent lawsuit provides a case study on what NOT to do when handling employee complaints. How bad was it? A jury awarded an eight-figure ...

  • Employment Law
Not again! Employer will pay $42K for all-too-common accommodation mistake

When it comes to accommodation of employee disabilities, you would think employers would learn from others’ mistakes. But it just does...

  • Employment Law
Was Safety Training Adequate? Worker Gets Hurt While Using Ladder

A federal court in Texas addressed safety training claims raised by a Home Depot worker who was injured while using a ladder to retrieve a ...

  • Employment Law
Questionable FMLA Certification? 5 Ways to Fix the Problem

Pop quiz: Do you know what to do with incomplete or unclear Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) certifications? Most HR pros agree that...

  • Employment Law
Sex Discrimination: Company to Pay $5.5M to Settle EEOC Lawsuit

A national trucking company has agreed to pay $5.5 million to resolve claims that it refused to hire qualified female drivers across the U....

  • Employment Law
5 lawsuits in 5 days: EEOC goes on warpath with new ADA filings

An onslaught of new lawsuits filed by the EEOC near the end of September demonstrates the wide scope of protection afforded to applicants a...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.