Skip to main content

DUI and threats: Was termination justified?

TD

By

Last updated November 6, 20242 min read
DUI and threats: Was termination justified?

Finding substantial evidence supported a Tennessee school district’s decision to dismiss a teacher for driving under the influence and threatening a co-worker, the Court of Appeals of Tennessee upheld his dismissal. 

For almost 20 years, the teacher instructed students with special needs.

His classroom performance was exemplary. But in 2018, law enforcement arrested him for driving under the influence.

After pleading guilty to the charge, he lost his license for a year. Although driving while intoxicated can be grounds for dismissal of a tenured teacher, the director of schools decided to retain the teacher based on his outstanding service record. He suspended the teacher for three days. And he admonished him not to engage in conduct requiring dismissal.

Teacher Is Arrested for Driving Violation

A few months later, law enforcement arrested the teacher for driving on a revoked license. While investigating this incident, the director of schools learned the teacher had threatened a middle school basketball coach. It appeared that the teacher suspected the coach was having an affair with his wife. The wife also taught in the district.

This time, the director asked the board of education to approve dismissal charges against the teacher for unprofessional conduct and insubordination. During a full hearing before an impartial hearing officer, evidence showed that the teacher sent the coach five text messages, including one threatening to “beat the hell out of him.”

At the hearing, the district learned that the teacher was arrested in 2014 for driving under the influence.

A hearing officer recommended dismissing the teacher for unprofessional conduct and insubordination.

The board approved the decision. A state court upheld the board. The teacher appealed to the court of appeals. There, he argued the board violated his due process rights by relying on a 2014 arrest that had not been included in the notice of charges against him.

Instead, the court found the notice of charges fully apprised the teacher of the unprofessional conduct and insubordination charges and the evidence against him.

Court Finds Notice Was Clear

Further, the court found the notice specified that the charges were based on the teacher’s 2018 conviction, disregard for the director’s warning to avoid future issues, his subsequent arrest for driving on a revoked license and his threats directed at the basketball coach.

In the court’s opinion, the board did not base its decision on the 2014 arrest.

If it was considered at all, it was only to show the teacher knew of the possible consequences of unprofessional behavior outside school.

Finding no basis to set aside the decision, the court held for the board of education.

Hubbard v. Claiborne County Board of Educ., No. E2020 00517 COA R3CV, 2021 WL 4775952 (Tenn. Ct. App. 10/13/21).

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]