• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Holiday Lights Fiasco: Drunk Worker Falls Off Ladder – Can He Get Comp?

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: December 12, 2024
3 minute engagement
Reach of workers' comp can be broad

In a workers’ comp case out of New York, an employee took decking the halls to the next level by imbibing while decorating the workplace. 

While attempting to retrieve holiday lights from a shelf, the worker fell approximately eight feet from a ladder and suffered serious injuries. 

A toxicology screening performed at the hospital determined the employee was “severely intoxicated by alcohol” at the time of his fall. 

So, was he entitled to workers’ comp even though he was under the influence of alcohol at work?

Was Alcohol or Holiday Rush to Blame?

The employee later testified that “usually two people would work together with one climbing and the other holding the ladder, but at the time of the accident he was working alone because they were busy.”

According to the employee, he was descending the ladder with a heavy box of lights. As he did, “the ladder moved and fell on his side, causing him to fall to the floor and sustain injuries.”

A medical expert testified about the negative cognitive and physical effects caused by elevated blood alcohol levels similar to the employee’s on the day of the accident.

The expert acknowledged that “an unsteady ladder or carrying something down a ladder increases the risk of and could contribute to falling, irrespective of alcohol impairment.”

The employer and its workers’ compensation carrier denied the claim, saying the accident happened because the employee was intoxicated, so he wasn’t eligible for workers’ comp.

The dispute reached a New York appeals court.

Can ‘Severely Intoxicated’ Employees Get Workers’ Comp?

New York’s Workers’ Compensation Law § 10 covers liability issues.

Importantly, it “provides a presumption of compensability for ‘disability or death from injury arising out of and in the course of employment without regard to fault as a cause of the injury, except … when the injury has been solely occasioned by intoxication from alcohol,’” the court explained.

Moreover, it’s well-established that workers’ comp carriers have a “heavy burden” to:

  1. Overcome the presumption, and
  2. Establish that intoxication was the sole cause of the accident.

Here, the evidence shows that the employee was “severely intoxicated” at the time of the accident, the court acknowledged. 

But the evidence also showed that the employee’s fall could “also be attributed to the absence of another employee holding the ladder, a simple misjudgment of footing … or the inherent risk of working at height,” the court explained. 

In the court’s view, the employer and the workers’ comp carrier failed to overcome the presumption of compensability as intoxication was not the sole cause of the accident.

The employee was entitled to workers’ comp, so the court affirmed the decision in the employee’s favor.

’Tis the Season for Legal Headaches

Of course, this isn’t the first time an employer has faced a legal hassle during the hustle and bustle of the holiday season.

For example, a Georgia employee had a religious accommodation allowing her to take off work on Tuesdays to attend religious services. However, during the holiday season in 2019, the employer revoked the accommodation and said she needed to work due to the holiday rush.

The EEOC stepped in and filed a lawsuit on the employee’s behalf. Ultimately, the employer paid $25,000 to settle the case.

Timely Lesson for HR

These cases highlight the importance of not using “the holiday rush” as an excuse to cut corners on compliance issues and workplace safety.

To help keep employees safe and respect their legal rights during the holidays, HR can:

  • Conduct a risk assessment. Identify high-risk activities, including increased workloads and seasonal tasks associated with holiday decorating, and mitigate those risks with clear policies.
  • Communicate with managers and employees. Share safety protocols and accommodation rights in advance of the holiday season. Plainly state that “being busy due to the holiday rush” is not an acceptable reason to shirk the rules.
  • Offer holiday-specific training. Provide periodic reminders about safe work practices and respectful workplace behavior throughout the holiday season. 

Lujan-Espinzo v. Elec. Illuminations by Arnold Inc., No. CV-23-0458, 2024 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321 (N.Y. App. Div. 10/10/24).

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

How Gwinnett County Strengthens Employee Wellbeing with Maven

Provided by Maven Clinic

Webinars

How Hiring Will Change Post COVID-19: 7 tips to hire top talent in the new normal

Webinars

The Compounding Cost of Payroll Inaccuracy

Provided by TestAssure

Webinars

5 Ways Your Pre-Boarding Process Falls Flat

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
5 Latest Overtime Violation Cases: DOL Penalties Explained

When you think about the latest overtime news, the first thing that probably comes to mind is the recent federal court decision that vacate...

  • Employment Law
  • HR Technology
6 Top Employer of Record Software for Global Companies in 2026

As global hiring expands, Employer of Record software has become an essential solution for HR teams seeking to manage international talent ...

  • Employment Law
Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions: 5 Takeaways for HR

A new Supreme Court decision has changed how federal rules can be blocked in court. While the facts of the case fall outside the employment...

  • Employment Law
ERISA Plan Docs: Are You Doing What the Law Requires?

Among the more head-spinning laws HR has to grapple with, the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) ranks near the top of the l...

  • Employment Law
$30K FMLA Retaliation Case: DOL Finds Worker Was Forced Out 

When most HR leaders picture FMLA retaliation, they think of a termination letter. But it can also come disguised as a “choice”...

  • Employment Law
Retaliation Blunder: C-Suite’s Mistake Cost Company $137K

As an HR professional, you know some conversations must be handled carefully to avoid a retaliation lawsuit.   But sometimes y...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.