• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Holiday Lights Fiasco: Drunk Worker Falls Off Ladder – Can He Get Comp?

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: December 12, 2024
3 minute engagement
Reach of workers' comp can be broad
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

In a workers’ comp case out of New York, an employee took decking the halls to the next level by imbibing while decorating the workplace. 

While attempting to retrieve holiday lights from a shelf, the worker fell approximately eight feet from a ladder and suffered serious injuries. 

A toxicology screening performed at the hospital determined the employee was “severely intoxicated by alcohol” at the time of his fall. 

So, was he entitled to workers’ comp even though he was under the influence of alcohol at work?

Was Alcohol or Holiday Rush to Blame?

The employee later testified that “usually two people would work together with one climbing and the other holding the ladder, but at the time of the accident he was working alone because they were busy.”

According to the employee, he was descending the ladder with a heavy box of lights. As he did, “the ladder moved and fell on his side, causing him to fall to the floor and sustain injuries.”

A medical expert testified about the negative cognitive and physical effects caused by elevated blood alcohol levels similar to the employee’s on the day of the accident.

The expert acknowledged that “an unsteady ladder or carrying something down a ladder increases the risk of and could contribute to falling, irrespective of alcohol impairment.”

The employer and its workers’ compensation carrier denied the claim, saying the accident happened because the employee was intoxicated, so he wasn’t eligible for workers’ comp.

The dispute reached a New York appeals court.

Can ‘Severely Intoxicated’ Employees Get Workers’ Comp?

New York’s Workers’ Compensation Law § 10 covers liability issues.

Importantly, it “provides a presumption of compensability for ‘disability or death from injury arising out of and in the course of employment without regard to fault as a cause of the injury, except … when the injury has been solely occasioned by intoxication from alcohol,’” the court explained.

Moreover, it’s well-established that workers’ comp carriers have a “heavy burden” to:

  1. Overcome the presumption, and
  2. Establish that intoxication was the sole cause of the accident.

Here, the evidence shows that the employee was “severely intoxicated” at the time of the accident, the court acknowledged. 

But the evidence also showed that the employee’s fall could “also be attributed to the absence of another employee holding the ladder, a simple misjudgment of footing … or the inherent risk of working at height,” the court explained. 

In the court’s view, the employer and the workers’ comp carrier failed to overcome the presumption of compensability as intoxication was not the sole cause of the accident.

The employee was entitled to workers’ comp, so the court affirmed the decision in the employee’s favor.

’Tis the Season for Legal Headaches

Of course, this isn’t the first time an employer has faced a legal hassle during the hustle and bustle of the holiday season.

For example, a Georgia employee had a religious accommodation allowing her to take off work on Tuesdays to attend religious services. However, during the holiday season in 2019, the employer revoked the accommodation and said she needed to work due to the holiday rush.

The EEOC stepped in and filed a lawsuit on the employee’s behalf. Ultimately, the employer paid $25,000 to settle the case.

Timely Lesson for HR

These cases highlight the importance of not using “the holiday rush” as an excuse to cut corners on compliance issues and workplace safety.

To help keep employees safe and respect their legal rights during the holidays, HR can:

  • Conduct a risk assessment. Identify high-risk activities, including increased workloads and seasonal tasks associated with holiday decorating, and mitigate those risks with clear policies.
  • Communicate with managers and employees. Share safety protocols and accommodation rights in advance of the holiday season. Plainly state that “being busy due to the holiday rush” is not an acceptable reason to shirk the rules.
  • Offer holiday-specific training. Provide periodic reminders about safe work practices and respectful workplace behavior throughout the holiday season. 

Lujan-Espinzo v. Elec. Illuminations by Arnold Inc., No. CV-23-0458, 2024 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321 (N.Y. App. Div. 10/10/24).

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Recognition Is a System, Not a Moment

Provided by Terryberry

White Papers

Employee Engagement Trends 2026

Provided by Inspirus

Webinars

5 Compliance Signals HR Should Review Before 2027

Provided by Navex

White Papers

The Six Steps to a Healthy Employee Engagement Program

Provided by Terryberry

SPONSORED CONTENT

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Benefits

Staff Administration

sponsored content
PEO ROI: 3 Numbers to Know Before You Leave Patchwork HR

Courtesy of TRINET

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Worker Falls to Death: Now the Blame Game Is on

A contractor was not legally responsible for the death of a laborer who fell to his death while working for a subcontractor, a New Jersey a...

  • Employment Law
EEOC Issues Final PWFA Rule: 5 Keys HR Needs to Know

The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (EEOC) has issued the long-awaited final PWFA rule, slated to be published in the Federal Regis...

  • Employment Law
New National Origin Discrimination Settlement: $1.25M Payout Linked to Ugly Email

A federal contractor headquartered in Washington, D.C., will pay $1.25 million to settle a national origin discrimination lawsuit filed on ...

  • Employment Law
$30K FMLA Retaliation Case: DOL Finds Worker Was Forced Out 

When most HR leaders picture FMLA retaliation, they think of a termination letter. But it can also come disguised as a “choice”...

  • Employment Law
  • Payroll
New Back Wages Settlement: San Diego Deli to Pay $500K

A San Diego deli will pay more than $500,000 in back wages after a federal investigation found it paid workers a flat daily rate that fell ...

  • Employment Law
Jobs for Men Only? Employer Pays $1.6M to Settle EEOC Lawsuit

A contract security solutions provider headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, has agreed to pay $1.6 million to settle an EEOC lawsuit that ...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | HRMorning Insider? Manage your subscription
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.