• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Off-the-Clock Work and FLSA Compliance: New DOL Opinion Letter FLSA2026-8

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: June 5, 2026
3 minute engagement
A Corporate Memphis style promotional graphic for an HRMorning article titled "DOL ADDRESSES OFF-THE-CLOCK WORK." The text is presented in bold white typography over a deep terracotta background. On the right, the illustration portrays two professionals addressing compliance parameters. A woman in a business blazer gestures up to a floating clock face, symbolizing regulatory working hours. Beside her, a colleague crosses his arms in a "stop" or prohibitive gesture, communicating boundaries against unrecorded labor. Abstract geometric shapes and empty speech fragments hover around them, visually reinforcing the complexity of tracking remote, mobile, or after-hours duties within federal compliance boundaries.

A new DOL opinion letter addresses off-the-clock work, rounding policies, and the de minimis defense – and the conclusions should prompt a hard look at pre-shift timekeeping practices.

The question came from a public hospital with roughly 18,000 non-exempt workers. The DOL responded by issuing Opinion Letter FLSA2026-8 on May 28, 2026.

When Off-the-Clock Work Is Compensable Under the FLSA?

The hospital allowed employees to clock in up to seven minutes before their shift to avoid bottlenecks at timekeeping stations. The timekeeping system rounded those early clock-ins up to the scheduled start time, so employees were never paid for that window.

The problem: Non-exempt employees, including respiratory therapists, routinely began substantive work immediately after clocking in. That included receiving handoff reports from outgoing colleagues, locating patient assignments and completing accountability documentation.

DOL Findings on Pre-Shift Work, Rounding and De Minimis

The DOL addressed three issues: pre-shift compensability, the de minimis doctrine and the hospital’s rounding policy.

On pre-shift work, the DOL drew a clear line. Activities that are integral and indispensable to an employee’s principal job duties are compensable – whenever they occur. For respiratory therapists, receiving a handoff report on patient status before the shift clock starts is not optional prep. It is essential to performing the job. Waiting in line to clock in, on the other hand, is not compensable, even when it happens on the employer’s premises.

On de minimis, the hospital argued the pre-shift window was de minimis. But the DOL pushed back. Where compensable pre-shift work is regular and predictable, and the employer already has the technology to track exact clock-in times, the de minimis defense is unlikely to hold, the agency determined.

On rounding, the DOL found the hospital’s policy problematic. FLSA rounding is permissible only when the practice is facially neutral and averages out over time, meaning employees must have at least some opportunity to benefit. Here, the hospital’s policy rounded early clock-ins up to the scheduled start time — and only in that direction. If employees were performing compensable work during that window, the policy wasn’t neutral and could produce minimum wage or overtime violations.

Bottom Line: DOL Opinion Letter FLSA2026-8

Employers cannot rely on de minimis claims or one-sided rounding policies to avoid paying for regular off-the-clock work – particularly when modern timekeeping systems make it easy to capture that time.

The DOL’s analysis centered on a hospital, but the legal principles apply to any employer with non-exempt workers who arrive early and start working before the clock officially starts.

Practical Takeaways

For payroll and HR teams, best practices for FLSA compliance include:

  • Audit which positions routinely begin substantive duties before the shift starts, and confirm that those employees are being compensated for that time.
  • Review rounding policies to ensure employees have at least some ability to benefit. A policy that only ever favors the employer is not neutral rounding.
  • Prohibit off-the-clock work in writing – but understand that a written policy doesn’t eliminate the pay obligation. Employers must compensate for work they know or should know is being performed.
  • Track pre-shift time by role, not by assumption. Whether an activity is compensable depends on what the employee actually does, not on a blanket classification.
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

How HR Can Thrive

Webinars

Support Your D&I Initiatives with Virtual Hiring Events

White Papers

State of Women’s and Family Health Benefits 2026

Provided by Maven Clinic

White Papers

TriNet AI in HR eGuide 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Mandatory prayer meetings: Employer pays $50K to settle EEOC lawsuit

When it comes to religious expression at work, just how far can a company go before crossing a line? For example, earlier this summer, ...

  • Employment Law
OSHA’s Evolving Safety Standards: What HR and Risk Leaders Need to Know

Workplace safety has always been a balancing act between compliance and genuine risk reduction. Nowhere is that more evident than in indust...

  • Employment Law
Data privacy class action: $6.9M settlement agreement puts employers on notice

Earlier this spring, we gave you the top five employment law changes to closely monitor in 2023, and data privacy regulations made our shor...

  • Employment Law
8th Circuit Upholds ADA Accommodation Win for Deaf Driver

Memo to HR: In ADA accommodation cases, be sure to conduct an individualized assessment of the applicant or employee before you conclude th...

  • Employment Law
Now wear this: Tesla wins appeal in work uniforms dispute

A new federal appeals court ruling is good news for any employer that requires its employees to wear work uniforms. The U.S. Court of Ap...

  • Employment Law
Costly FLSA ‘hot goods’ lesson: Company pays $1.1M for contractors’ illegal wage practices

Beyond Yoga recently paid more than $1.1 million to cover back wages and damages owed to its contractors’ employees who were allegedly sh...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.