DOJ guidance on opioid use disorder and ADA
By

The amount of people struggling with opioid addictions continues to grow in the U.S. at an alarming rate. And the Department of Justice (DOJ) is ready to do battle with its comprehensive action plan that includes enforcing the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The ADA prohibits discrimination against people in recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD) who aren’t using illegal drugs. This includes people taking legally-prescribed medication to treat OUD.
The DOJ recently published guidance to protect employees with OUD from discrimination. That, according to the DOJ, is a vital part of fighting the epidemic in U.S. communities.
Here are some of the issues covered in the guidance:
Under the ADA, does an employee in treatment or recovery from OUD have a disability?
Yes. However, there is an exception. If the person engages currently in illegal drug use, then they aren’t considered as having a disability. “The ADA does not protect individuals engaged in the current illegal use of drugs if an entity takes action against them because of that illegal drug use.”
The ADA defines “current illegal use of drugs” as “illegal use of drugs that occurred recently enough to justify a reasonable belief that a person’s drug use is current or that continuing use is a real and ongoing problem.” This doesn’t include taking medication, including an opioid or medication used to treat OUD under the supervision of a healthcare professional.
The reason it’s covered under the ADA is twofold:
- Drug addiction is considered a physical or mental impairment, and
- Drug addiction substantially limits one or more major life activities.
If an employee with OUD is currently in a drug treatment program, are they protected under the ADA?
Yes, as long as they aren’t engaging in illegal drug use and are in a supervised rehab or drug treatment program.
What about people who have a past OUD history?
Individuals with past OUD are still protected under the ADA because they have a “record of” disability.
Do people who are regarded as having OUD, whether or not they actually have it, have any legal protection under the ADA?
Yes. Even if a person doesn’t have OUD, but is “regarded” as having OUD, they’re protected under the ADA.
Is an employee who is associated with someone who has OUD protected under the ADA?
Again, the answer is yes. The act prevents discrimination based on known associations or relationships with people who have disabilities. This includes friends, co-workers and/or family members.
Are employers allowed to have drug policies or conduct drug testing for opioids?
Yes. If a policy or procedure is designed to ensure employees aren’t using illegal drugs, employers may implement it. That includes drug testing. However, if an employee who tests positive for opioid use is able to show the medication was prescribed or administered by a licensed healthcare professional and that professional is supervising its use, they may not be denied or fired from a job because it’s considered legal use of medication. The exception to this is if they can’t perform “the job safely and effectively, or are disqualified under another federal law.”
Note: While this guidance was specifically about OUD, it applies to any substance use disorders.
Further Reading
FMLA Intermittent Leave: 8 Questions HR Asks Most
Partial days, doctor’s notes, late arrivals. If intermittent FMLA leave keeps you guessing, these eight answers can help clear things up for HR.
Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K
A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]
Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps
Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]
USCIS Plans to Abolish 60-Day Grace Period for Certain Nonimmigrant Workers
On Sept. 11, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if adopted, would eliminate the 60-day grace period currently granted to most nonimmigrant workers in H-1B, H-1B1, E-1, E-2, E-3, L-1, O-1 or TN status who abruptly lose their positions. The grace period has been in place since […]
Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims
Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]
Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny
Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]