Skip to main content

Forced prayer meetings? That’ll cost employer $375K

TD

By

Last updated November 6, 20241 min read

A medical practice and the physician who ran it have been hit with a $375,000 judgment in a federal lawsuit that accused the defendants of subjecting employees to a religiously hostile work environment.

The suit also said the defendants retaliated against employees who objected to required religious practices. 

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) accused Tim Shepherd and Shepherd Healthcare of engaging in religious discrimination by conducting mandatory daily meetings that involved prayer and a reading of biblical verses.

It said an employee who follows the principles of Buddhism was fired a day after she renewed a previous request to be excused.

In addition, the suit alleged that Shepherd Healthcare imposed religious practices on employees and fired other employees who expressed objections or opposition.

The allegations from the suit present a textbook example of one of the things Title VII bars employees from doing.

Consider this example from guidance offered by EEOC:

Michael’s employer requires that the mandatory weekly staff meeting begin with a religious prayer.  Michael objects to participating because he believes it conflicts with his own sincerely held religious beliefs.  He asks his supervisor to allow him to arrive at the meeting after the prayer.  The supervisor must accommodate Michael’s religious belief by either granting his request or offering an alternative accommodation that would remove the conflict between Michael’s religious belief and the staff meeting prayer, even if other employees of Michael’s religion do not object to being present for the prayer. The outcome would be the same if Michael sought the accommodation based on his lack of religious belief.

To end the suit, the defendants will pay $375,000. Monetary relief will be provided to 10 former employees. In addition, the defendants must provide Title VII training to managers and employees.

Further, they are banned from requiring employees to engage in religious activities at work.

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]