• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

State: Snap Pays $15M After Women Told to ‘Wait Their Turn’

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: July 18, 2024
3 minute engagement
qual pay lawsuit ends with big payout
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

Snap Inc. – the parent company of Snapchat – has agreed to pay $15 million to resolve gender discrimination, harassment and retaliation claims brought by female employees of the social media platform, the California Civil Rights Division (CRD) has announced.

In addition to the eight-figure financial payout, the company must provide significant non-monetary relief.

This case outlines specific steps companies can take to ensure all workers are paid fairly.  

Did company growth lead to gender discrimination?

Between 2014 and 2017, Snapchat underwent a period of rapid growth. Due to this growth, the company increased its employee count from 250 in 2015 to more than 5,000 in 2022.

But the company failed to take adequate measures to ensure that female employees “were paid or promoted equally, resulting in marginalization of women at Snap,” the CRD concluded after an investigation.

Moreover, female employees “encountered a glass ceiling and were told to wait their turn” when they sought promotions. They were “actively discouraged from applying for promotions, or lost promotion opportunities to less qualified male colleagues,” the CRD determined.

The women claimed that men on hiring panels were often “dismissive of female candidates, making belittling comments about their candidacy.”

Some women “suffered unwelcome sexual advances and other harassing conduct,” the CRD also found. When they spoke up, the women said they faced retaliation in a variety of ways, including:

  • denial of professional opportunities
  • negative performance reviews, and
  • termination of employment.

The women said they complained about the alleged gender discrimination, harassment and retaliation to no avail, as their complaints “were not adequately dealt with” and “no meaningful action” was taken.

In the CRD’s view, the alleged conduct amounted to violations of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act and Equal Pay Act, both of which prohibit gender discrimination.

The state agency filed a lawsuit in state court on behalf of female employees who worked at Snapchat between 2014 and 2024.

Settlement requires steps to combat gender discrimination

Shortly afterward, the parties reached a settlement agreement, the CRD announced. Under the consent decree, Snap must:

  • Pay $15 million to cover legal fees and provide relief to female employees who worked at the company between 2014 and 2024
  • Hire a third-party consultant to evaluate and make recommendations to revise Snap’s employment policies and procedures involving its female employees in California
  • Remedy any pay disparities against female employees that cannot be explained by legitimate business reasons
  • Permit employees to discuss employee compensation, including disclosing their own wages and inquiring about the wages of others
  • Refrain from using prior pay or salary history to set compensation
  • Provide written notification at the beginning of the hiring process to notify job applicants that compensation may be negotiable within the compensation range
  • Post job openings and promotion opportunities internally to all staff on the company intranet
  • Hire an independent consultant to annually audit the company’s sexual harassment, retaliation and gender discrimination compliance, and
  • Provide staff training that includes discussions about:
    • Eliminating bias, including gender discrimination, in promotion and compensation decisions, and
    • Creating a culture of pay equity.

“In California, we’re proud of the work of our state’s innovators who are a driving force of our nation’s economy,” CRD Director Kevin Kish said in a statement. “We’re also proud of the strength of our state’s civil rights laws, which help ensure every worker is protected against discrimination and has an opportunity to thrive. This settlement with Snapchat demonstrates a shared commitment to a California where all workers have a fair chance at the American Dream. Women are entitled to equality in every job, in every workplace, and in every industry.”

Info: Civil Rights Department Obtains $15 Million Settlement Agreement with Snapchat Over Alleged Sex-Based Employment Discrimination, 6/19/24.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Harvard Business Review AI Talent Playbook

Webinars

Your Policy Changed. Did Employee Behavior?

Provided by Navex

White Papers

The High-Risk Pregnancy Gap: Catch Complications Before They Become Claims

Provided by Maven Clinic

Webinars

Every Family Counts: How to Build an Adoption-Friendly Workplace

Provided by Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption

SPONSORED CONTENT

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Employer Blamed for Ugly Injury: Worker Suffers Burns to Face

The Department of Labor has determined that an employer is to blame for injuries suffered by a worker whose face was burned as he was clean...

  • Employment Law
Non-Compete Agreement Ban: What The Latest Court Ruling Means

A second federal district court has preliminarily enjoined enforcement of the FTC’s pending ban on non-compete agreements, finding that t...

  • Employment Law
There’s no law against being a jerk: Check out this new court ruling

There’s a big difference between mistreating an employee and mistreating an employee for a reason that the law prohibits. In other wor...

  • Employment Law
FMLA For Expectant Fathers: When Leave Does – and Doesn’t – Apply

When are expectant fathers entitled to FMLA leave? And what exactly are they entitled to? What about FMLA leave for new fathers? A new ...

  • Employment Law
Did Toxic Workplace Lead to Birth Defects? Suit Gets New Life

An employer may be responsible for birth defects allegedly caused by its workers’ exposure to toxic chemicals, a state appeals court in I...

  • Employment Law
DOL: Childcare Worker Fired for Reporting Safety Concerns

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has ordered a daycare facility to reinstate a fired childcare worker and pay $43,295 in back wages and d...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.