Quarterly Bonus and Overtime Pay: DOL Opinion Letter FLSA2026-6
By

Does a quarterly bonus trigger an overtime recalculation? A recent DOL opinion letter says it depends on how the bonus is structured – and one approach eliminates the need for retroactive regular rate recalculation.
The question came from an employer that pays a quarterly non-discretionary bonus to eligible employees, some of whom work overtime. The DOL responded by issuing Opinion Letter FLSA2026-6.
How the Quarterly Bonus Was Structured
Under the FLSA, non-discretionary bonuses paid to overtime-eligible employees typically require employers to go back and recompute the regular rate for each workweek in the bonus period – then pay any additional overtime premium that results. For a quarterly bonus, that is a significant administrative undertaking.
But an exception exists: A bonus that increases an employee’s total earnings – straight time and overtime combined – by the same fixed percentage already includes the overtime premium on the bonus. No retroactive recalculation required.
The employer here used a bonus pool tied to quarterly sales revenue. Each eligible employee’s share was determined by calculating what percentage their total gross earnings represented of all eligible employees’ combined gross earnings for the quarter. The question was whether that pool-based structure still qualified for the exception.
What the DOL Found
The DOL concluded it did. Because the pool formula incorporates both straight-time and overtime earnings when determining each employee’s share, the overtime component is already embedded in the payout. Requiring an additional overtime adjustment on top of that would amount to paying overtime twice on the same earnings.
DOL Opinion Letter FLSA2026-6: Key Conditions
The percentage of total earnings approach isn’t a free pass. The DOL identified several conditions that must be met:
- Total earnings used in the calculation must include overtime pay – not just straight-time earnings
- The bonus cannot apply a higher percentage increase to straight-time earnings than to overtime earnings. A structure that weights straight time more heavily is not carrying its own overtime cost and recomputation is required
- The calculation cannot include items previously excluded from the regular rate – discretionary bonuses, expense reimbursements, or employer benefit contributions. Including those distorts the base and breaks the proportionality, and
- A bonus that decreases as overtime hours increase also disqualifies – the DOL treats that as evasion of the FLSA’s overtime requirements.
If those conditions are met, the employer distributes the bonus and moves on. No retroactive regular rate recalculation. No additional overtime payment.
Practical Takeaway
For payroll teams managing non-discretionary bonus programs, best practices include:
- Confirm the bonus calculation includes both straight-time and overtime earnings. Exclude overtime and the percentage of total earnings treatment does not apply
- Keep excluded items – discretionary bonuses, expense reimbursements, benefit contributions – out of the earnings base
- Verify the same percentage increase applies to overtime as to straight-time earnings. Dilute the overtime portion and you have FLSA exposure, and
- Confirm payroll is executing the calculation the way the bonus plan describes it. A mismatch between the plan document and actual payroll practice is where compliance breaks down.
Further Reading
FMLA Intermittent Leave: 8 Questions HR Asks Most
Partial days, doctor’s notes, late arrivals. If intermittent FMLA leave keeps you guessing, these eight answers can help clear things up for HR.
Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K
A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]
Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps
Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]
USCIS Plans to Abolish 60-Day Grace Period for Certain Nonimmigrant Workers
On Sept. 11, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if adopted, would eliminate the 60-day grace period currently granted to most nonimmigrant workers in H-1B, H-1B1, E-1, E-2, E-3, L-1, O-1 or TN status who abruptly lose their positions. The grace period has been in place since […]
Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims
Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]
Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny
Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]