• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Worker Fired After Filing OSHA Complaint: Company Pays $753K

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: June 3, 2024
3 minute engagement
EEOC Lawsuit Ends With Settlement

Here’s a cautionary tale showing how expensive retaliating against employees can be.

An employer in Rhode Island threatened and then fired an employee who filed an OSHA complaint.

This prompted the DOL to open two investigations and file a lawsuit, which was “one of the few joint cases the [agency] has ever filed involving retaliation claims asserted” under both the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the DOL announced in a press release.  

Nail salon employee files OSHA complaint

Steven Xingri Cao owns three nail salons – New VIP Nail Spa Inc., VIP Neo Nails Inc. and VIP Spa & Nails Inc. – located in Rhode Island.

In July 2020, Cao fired and threatened an employee who was sickened by an undiluted sanitizer, raised safety and health complaints with management and then filed an OSHA complaint, the DOL’s lawsuit alleged.

Cao also threatened another employee who had a close relationship with the fired employee, the agency claimed.

Feds open dual investigations

Two agency departments – the Wage and Hour Division and OSHA – opened investigations into alleged violations of the OSH Act and the FLSA.

The agency’s investigations determined the nail salon:

  • Failed to pay proper overtime compensation to employees who worked more than 40 hours in a workweek
  • Did not maintain accurate work records
  • Provided false information to investigators, and
  • Compelled employees to sign documents that contained false information about their employment.

In the DOL’s view, the alleged conduct violated the OSH Act and the FLSA.

In February 2024, the parties reached an agreement to settle the case.

Six-figure payout to settle the case

The consent judgment permanently forbids Cao and the businesses from future violations of the OSH Act and the FLSA. The judgment also requires them to pay out $753,500, broken down as follows:

  • $168,000 in OSHA compensatory, punitive and emotional distress damages to the employee who was fired for raising safety and health complaints.
  • $23,500 in OSHA punitive damages to the other employee who was threatened.
  • $550,000 — $275,000 in back wages and $275,000 in liquidated damages — to 70 employees for FLSA overtime violations.
  • $12,000 in FLSA punitive damages to employees who were coerced to sign false employment documents.

In addition to the financial payout, the owner must also:

  • Provide anti-retaliation training to supervisors.
  • Post a notice in English, Spanish and Korean at each workplace explaining employees’ rights.
  • Hire a payroll monitor for at least two years to evaluate FLSA compliance in the future and hire an independent safety consultant to audit the nail salons to identify any safety and health hazards.
  • Arrange a meeting among nail salon owners and representatives of OSHA and the Wage and Hour Division for purposes of DOL outreach to industry employers.

“Unfortunately, workers face several types of unlawful conduct by their employers, including unfair wages, unsafe working conditions and retaliation. When workers’ rights are violated under multiple statutes, the U.S. Department of Labor will move decisively to vindicate their rights in as holistic a way as possible,” said Regional Solicitor of Labor Maia Fisher in Boston.

“This employer’s egregious actions in firing and threatening workers for raising health concerns and complaining to OSHA defy the law and place workers at potential risk,” said OSHA Regional Administrator Galen Blanton in Boston. “Discouraging or preventing workers from participating in an OSHA inspection may mask or delay identification and correction of hazards that could sicken or injure them.”

“This consent judgment — which requires payment of $562,000 in FLSA back wages and damages — sends a strong message to employers that failing to pay employees properly and retaliating against workers who assert their wage and hour-related rights can have costly consequences,” said Wage and Hour Division Northeast Regional Administrator Mark H. Watson Jr. in Philadelphia.

Info: Nail salons, owner agree to stop worker retaliation, pay $753K in back wages, damages after DOL investigations, litigation, 5/29/24.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

CSR Industry Review

Provided by Blackbaud

Webinars

Workplace Compliance Trends for 2025

Provided by Paycom

White Papers

ROI of Automated Workforce Management

Provided by WorkEasy

Webinars

The Manager Effect: The Most Overlooked Lever in Employee Experience

Provided by Inspirus

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
What is job ‘fractioning’ – and why should you care?

An unpublished court ruling says that “employers may not circumvent Title VII protections by ‘fractioning’ an employee’s job....

  • Employment Law
‘Stop WOKE Act’ Gets Stopped in Its Tracks by Appeals Court Ruling

A Florida law that targets “wokeness” violates the free speech rights of employers, a federal appeals court has ruled. The U.S. Cour...

  • Employment Law
  • Recruiting
No-Poach Recruiting Agreements Cost Employers $25.5 Million

Think it’s OK to agree with other employers not to recruit their employees if they won’t go after yours? Think again. That kind of a...

  • Employment Law
Repeated complaints about sexual harassment: Key mistake in response leads to $400K payout

The McDonald Oil Company agreed to pay $400,000 to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit, the EEOC announced in a press release. According ...

  • Employment Law
OSHA Blames Employer After Worker Dies on First Day of Work

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has determined that a worker died of heatstroke on his first day at work because a...

  • Employment Law
‘Woke’ training? Employee demands religious accommodation

Picture this: You make arrangements for new employee training that aligns with your company’s diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) i...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.