$200K Settlement Puts Sexual Harassment Under the Spotlight
By

Intrusive, intimate questions. Unwanted physical contact. A senior official publicly engaging in inappropriate conduct at an office holiday party. That’s what happened at a county public defender’s office, according to a sexual harassment complaint submitted to the California Civil Rights Department (CRD).
For HR leaders, this case highlights the strategic need to proactively address workplace behavior. Early detection and consistent enforcement of policies are critical to reducing exposure, sustaining employee trust, and protecting organizational performance.
Here’s what happened that led to a six-figure settlement.
Employee Alleges Sexual Harassment by Direct Supervisor
In 2024, the CRD received a complaint against the Tulare County Public Defender’s Office from an employee who allegedly endured years of unchecked sexual harassment by a direct supervisor. Specifically, the employee claimed the misconduct was both:
- Physical, including unwanted sexual contact, and
- Verbal, including intrusive and intimate questions.
The employee further alleged that “an openly tolerated culture of workplace misconduct” existed, citing an instance of a senior official acting in an inappropriate manner in front of dozens of staffers at a holiday party.
In the employee’s view, the sexual harassment was severe enough to amount to a hostile work environment – and that leadership failed to take reasonable steps to prevent harassment in the workplace.
The CRD investigated the complaint and offered to let the parties go to mediation to resolve the dispute.
Mediation Leads to $200K Payout – Plus Compliance Measures
The parties entered mediation. Without admitting liability, the public defender’s office agreed to take several steps to settle the sexual harassment complaint. It will:
- Pay $200,000 to the employee for lost wages and other harm
- Issue a bulletin to all staff to remind them of protections against sexual harassment in the workplace and options for reporting misconduct
- Ensure and certify to the state that supervisors and staff have taken mandatory training on the prevention of sexual harassment in the workplace
- Conduct a survey of all employees to gauge understanding of the office’s sexual harassment prevention policy and submit the results to CRD, and
- Report to CRD on how new workplace sexual harassment complaints have been handled for a period of one year.
“Leaders have an obligation to prevent and remedy sexual harassment in the workplace,” CRD Director Kevin Kish said in a press release. “It is unacceptable to allow inappropriate behavior to go unchecked. Through this settlement, the Tulare County Public Defender’s Office is taking important steps to ensure staff are able to do their critical work free from harassment.”
Takeaway for HR Leaders
The Tulare County settlement provides a real-life example of how sexual harassment claims can lead to significant costs and outside oversight. Along with the $200,000 payment, the office agreed to training, employee surveys, and reporting requirements – measures that carry both financial and operational impact.
These actions highlight that addressing sexual harassment is not only a legal obligation but a critical step in sustaining a safe, respectful workplace culture and protecting the organization from reputational and regulatory risk.
For employers, the broader point is clear: resolving claims often involves financial resources and demonstrable steps to strengthen workplace culture and compliance.
Action Steps for Employers
Practical steps for building a safer workplace include:
- Update and circulate harassment policies so employees know the rules
- Provide safe, confidential reporting channels employees can trust
- Act quickly on complaints and document how issues are resolved
- Train supervisors on how to spot and address misconduct before it escalates
- Hold leaders responsible for maintaining a respectful culture, and
- Monitor and evaluate workplace culture regularly to identify early signs of misconduct and track the effectiveness of prevention programs.
Settlements like this aren’t just financial hits; they signal a leadership breakdown. Taking these steps now protects employees, limits liability, and strengthens organizational credibility.
Further Reading
FMLA Intermittent Leave: 8 Questions HR Asks Most
Partial days, doctor’s notes, late arrivals. If intermittent FMLA leave keeps you guessing, these eight answers can help clear things up for HR.
Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K
A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]
Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps
Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]
USCIS Plans to Abolish 60-Day Grace Period for Certain Nonimmigrant Workers
On Sept. 11, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if adopted, would eliminate the 60-day grace period currently granted to most nonimmigrant workers in H-1B, H-1B1, E-1, E-2, E-3, L-1, O-1 or TN status who abruptly lose their positions. The grace period has been in place since […]
Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims
Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]
Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny
Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]