Skip to main content

Religious group to 5th Circuit: Vaccine mandate is ‘sin against God’

RM

By

Last updated November 6, 20241 min read
Religious group to 5th Circuit: Vaccine mandate is ‘sin against God’

With OSHA’s emergency temporary standard (ETS) in place and going into effect in Jan. 2022, many employees have begun to push back against the COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Most recently, a religious group petitioned the 5th Circuit to put a stop to OSHA’s ETS, saying imposing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate would violate religious workers’ beliefs.

Here’s why this petition won’t be moving forward.

Violation of beliefs

The American Family Association (doing business as Daystar Television Network) told the 5th Circuit that subjecting religious employees to OSHA’s vaccine mandate would be a “sin against God.”

In the petition, these employees elaborated by saying, “Any mandate that forces American Family Association to compel their employees to be vaccinated against their will is one that would require them to violate their employees’ sacred rights of belief and conscience.”

Reasonable accommodations available

In short, the company has a religious objection to the mandate. So why did the 5th Circuit dismiss the petition? Employment law attorney Jon Hyman explains.

Hyman says that OSHA’s vaccine mandate doesn’t in fact force employees to receive the vaccine. Those who don’t wish to be vaccinated due to religious beliefs have the option of getting tested for COVID-19 on a weekly basis and wearing face coverings in the workplace.

If, for some reason, the weekly testing and face coverings also violate an employee’s sincerely-held religious beliefs, employers may have to grant a further reasonable accommodation, such as remote work.

“There is simply no argument that the OSHA rule violates employees’ religious rights when the reasonable accommodation is baked right into the rule itself,” Hyman says.

Advertisement

Beacon from HRMorning: HR department of one? Beacon reads the law. You make the call. Try Beacon free.

While this petition was throw out, it is likely many more objections to the ETS will continue to pop up the closer we get to the January deadline.

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]