• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

He Got Workers’ Comp, But Now He Wants More: Court Says …

Tom D'Agostino
By: Tom D'Agostino
  • Share on

About the Author

Tom D’Agostino is an attorney and legal editor who has more than 30 years of experience writing about employment law, disability law and education law trends. He earned his B.A. degree from Ramapo College of New Jersey and his J.D. from the Duquesne University School of Law. D’Agostino, who is a member of the Pennsylvania bar, is a past member of the American Bar Association’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities and the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Legal Services to Persons with Disabilities Committee. He has provided technical assistance in the production of segments for television’s ABC World News and 20/20, and he has been quoted in periodicals including USA Today. He is also a past contributing author of Legal Rights of Persons with Disabilities: An Analysis of Federal Law, which is a comprehensive two-volume treatise addressing the legal rights of people with disabilities. Tom is passionate about baseball and authentic Italian food. When not writing, he enjoys spending time with family.

Show Less
Last Updated: August 9, 2024
3 minute engagement

Idaho’s highest court upheld a finding that an employee who received workers’ comp benefits was not further entitled to total and permanent disability benefits as well.

While working for Dependable Auto Sales in late March of 2018, Robert Nelson injured his back while lifting a garage door.

An x-ray showed degenerative disease of the lower spine, and a doctor issued a diagnosis of “acute back pain with left radiculopathy.”

Employee Files for Workers’ Comp Benefits

Nelson stopped working and filed a workers’ comp claim in mid-April of 2018. In the same month, he had an MRI that showed degeneration at his L5-S1 joint. A doctor said that lifting the door probably caused a flare-up of arthritis and a possible disc bulge in his back. Nelson never went back to work.

In August of 2018, the employer hired a doctor to perform an independent medical examination. That doctor said Nelson’s back problems were caused by his morbid obesity and were unrelated to work.

That doctor also said the door-lifting injury would have resolved in a few weeks, adding that Nelson could return to work with no restrictions.

A third doctor later agreed that Nelson’s back problems were unrelated to his work.

A fourth doctor then said that the work injury caused a permanent impairment and assigned an 11% permanent partial impairment.

Before the March 2018 injury, Nelson had suffered knee, ankle and shoulder injuries.

Vocational Assessments Differ

A vocational assessment made in December of 2020 concluded that Nelson was totally and permanently disabled, but another one completed in July of 2021 found he had no restrictions as a result of the March 2018 injury.

After an April 2018 workers’ comp claim was settled in September of 2019, Nelson filed a claim for total and permanent disability benefits in March of 2020.

At the hearing on that claim, it came to light that he had been charged in 1996 with felony insurance fraud in connection with a workers’ comp claim and had pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in that matter.

The referee who heard the later claim for total and permanent benefits determined that Nelson was not a credible witness and that his claim should be denied. The referee noted that Nelson had provided inconsistent testimony.

Application for Benefits Is Denied

A state commission adopted the referee’s recommendation and denied his claim for benefits. It said Nelson did not show that he was totally and permanently disabled or that he suffered a permanent impairment as a result of the March 2018 accident. Nelson then filed an appeal, which reached the Supreme Court of Idaho. He said the commission improperly found that he was not a credible witness, and that the finding improperly influenced its decision.

The question on appeal, the reviewing court explained, was whether “substantial and competent” evidence supported the commission’s determination.

The court noted that a preexisting permanent impairment is not an absolute bar to the recovery of total and permanent disability benefits. But to recover, a claimant must show that the combined effects of the preexisting injury and the work injury resulted in total and permanent disability – or that the work injury “aggravated or accelerated” the prior condition to cause total and permanent disability.

Reviewing Court Affirms Denial of Benefits

The reviewing court concluded that there was enough evidence for the commission to find that Nelson was not totally and permanently disabled.

It said that in evaluating Nelson’s credibility as a witness, the commission permissibly considered his 1996 misdemeanor conviction for insurance fraud.

Nelson argued that the conviction should not have been considered because it was irrelevant, but the court disagreed. It said that despite its age, the conviction went “to the very heart of this matter since it establishes Nelson previously lied in order to obtain workers’ compensation benefits.”

The order of the commission was affirmed.

Nelson v. State of Idaho, No. 50485-2023 (Idaho 8/6/24).

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

MODERNIZING LEGACY APPLICATIONS: WHEN, WHY, AND HOW

Provided by CHAMPS

Webinars

How Company Culture Boosts Employee Performance

Webinars

Pieced Together Isn’t a Program: How to Take Control of Your Employee Engagement Strategy

Provided by Terryberry

White Papers

Our mission is your mission: Re-imagine Work With an Agile HCM Solution

Provided by PeopleGuru

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Walmart to Pay $415K in Harassment Lawsuit: Key HR Lessons

When companies fail to enforce harassment policies, the cost isn’t just financial – it’s a hit to reputation, employee trust and lega...

  • Employment Law
Did Anti-Racism Training Create a Hostile Work Environment?

A federal court in Pennsylvania rejected a white employee’s claim that his employer created a hostile work environment by subjecting him ...

  • Employment Law
FMLA Training for Managers: 8 Important Things To Cover

Let’s face it: The Family and Medical Leave Act can be daunting for the most seasoned HR pros. So it’s not surprising that mana...

  • Employment Law
No Accommodation for High Blood Pressure: Verizon Pays $115K

According to the American Heart Association, an estimated 122.4 million – or 47% – of U.S. adults have hypertension, more commonly know...

  • Employment Law
7 bonus tips you absolutely need when dealing with job accommodation requests

What’s a valid accommodation request under the ADA or similar law? This case shows that the answer might not be as simple as you think...

  • Employment Law
Chicago Tip-Credit Cut Paused: Tipped Cash Wage Holds at $12.62

Chicago employers with tipped workers can leave the tipped cash wage where it is — a scheduled July 1 step-up is off. The city’s ti...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.