• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

DoorDash’s $16.75M Payout: A Warning on Tips & Transparency

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: March 6, 2025
3 minute engagement
Tipping Policy Is Bad For Business

DoorDash has agreed to pay $16.75 million to settle a dispute involving its practices on handling delivery workers’ tips, New York Attorney General Letitia James announced in a press release.

Here’s what happened, according to an investigation by the Office of the Attorney General (OAG).

Tips Paid Through App Not Given to Delivery Workers

Between May 2017 and September 2019, DoorDash used a “guaranteed pay” model that was supposed to let delivery workers see how much they’d be paid before accepting a delivery.

The OAG investigation found that DoorDash used customer tips collected through its app to offset the base pay it had already promised to delivery workers, rather than giving them the full amount of the tips. 

Additionally, the investigation deemed the pay model “deceptive” because delivery workers could only see their tips if they exceeded the guaranteed base pay for the order. 

For example, if a customer tipped $6 for an order with a guaranteed payment of $10, DoorDash applied that $6 tip to the guaranteed payment of $10, which meant the company only paid out $4. That meant the delivery worker received only $10 total instead of the $16 they should’ve earned ($10 in guaranteed money from DoorDash plus the customer’s $6 tip).

OAG: DoorDash ‘Deceived’ Workers and Customers

DoorDash also failed to disclose this practice to both customers and delivery workers. 

At checkout, customers were encouraged to tip with a message stating the delivery workers “will always receive 100 percent of the tip,” the OAG noted.

However, the details about how tips were actually used were buried in online documents and unavailable during key moments in the ordering process. As a result, customers had no way of knowing their tips were being used to offset DoorDash’s costs, the OAG determined.

“Delivery workers are integral to our communities, working tirelessly to bring food and other essentials directly to our doorsteps in all conditions,” AG James said in a statement. “DoorDash misled customers who generously tipped and deceived Dashers who deserved to be paid in full. This settlement returns millions to the pockets of hardworking Dashers and ensures transparency in DoorDash’s payment practices going forward. My office will continue to protect New York workers from deceptive business practices and ensure they receive all of the money they’ve earned.”

Company Must Pay Restitution, Provide Additional Relief

DoorDash agreed to pay $16.75 million in restitution, which will benefit approximately 63,000 delivery workers. Under the settlement agreement, DoorDash must also provide the following additional relief. 

  • Revise pay practices. DoorDash is required to maintain a pay model that ensures consumer tips are paid to delivery workers in their entirety without impacting DoorDash’s contribution to guaranteed pay.
  • Enhance transparency. The company must clearly disclose pay policy details to both delivery workers and consumers.  It must also improve pay transparency for delivery workers by sharing a breakdown of base pay, promotional bonuses and tips for every delivery.
  • Improve access to work history. Delivery workers, including those deactivated, must have access to their delivery history for at least four years.

Key Takeaways for HR

The DoorDash settlement highlights important pay and transparency lessons for HR:

1. Be Clear About Pay

Employees should fully understand how their wages, tips, and bonuses work. Clear communication about pay prevents confusion and reduces legal risks.

2. Avoid Misleading Statements

DoorDash’s misleading pay practices led to legal trouble. HR must ensure all compensation details in job postings, contracts, and policies are honest and accurate.

3. Follow Wage Laws

Mismanaging pay structures or hiding deductions can lead to lawsuits. Staying compliant with labor laws is essential to avoid costly penalties.

4. Give Employees Access to Pay Details

Workers need to see their pay breakdown and work history. Providing clear records builds trust and keeps companies accountable.

5. Fair Pay Builds a Stronger Brand

Unethical pay practices can damage an employer’s reputation. Treating workers fairly helps attract and retain talent while maintaining trust.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

Managing Performance in Times of Change

Webinars

Future of Work: Digitizing Workplace Experience

Webinars

The Compounding Cost of Payroll Inaccuracy

Provided by TestAssure

White Papers

New Technology: The Projected Total Economic Impact of Paycom’s Time Off Requests Featuring GONE

Provided by Paycom

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
New Illinois NICU Leave Law: 4 Keys Payroll Needs to Know

Illinois’ Family Neonatal Intensive Care Leave Act took effect on June 1, providing employees with children in a neonatal intensive c...

  • Employment Law
Inadequate training can support race bias claim, court says

Race bias claims can be based on inadequate training, a new ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit says. In this case,...

  • Employment Law
DOL’s New Report: FLSA Mistakes Cost a Whopping $149.9M in FY 2024

As an HR pro, you know that FLSA mistakes can be expensive. But even so, the sky-high cost of noncompliance found in the feds’ latest rep...

  • Employment Law
Is intern’s lip ring a reasonable accommodation? Manager’s mistake sends ADA case to trial

A manager’s mistake during discussions about an intern’s lip ring doomed an employer’s chance to nip an ADA case in the bud. Here...

  • Employment Law
Lessons From a $525K Racial Harassment Settlement

Nooses. White supremacy symbols. A manager who punished a worker for speaking up. That’s what the EEOC says happened at a crane compa...

  • Employment Law
Judge Slams Door on FTC Non-Compete Ban – for Everyone

As we predicted here just a short time ago, a federal court has issued a ruling that blocks the FTC’s non-compete ban from taking eff...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.