Skip to main content

E-Verify Expands Invalidated EAD Alerts, Raising I-9 Reverification Duties

CW

By

Last updated October 7, 20261 min read
E-Verify Expands Invalidated EAD Alerts, Raising I-9 Reverification Duties

Employers participating in E-Verify can use an expanded report to identify current employees who may require Form I-9 reverification.

The Department of Homeland Security recently expanded the E-Verify Status Change Report to include invalidated employment authorization documents (EADs) in the following categories:

  • A12 – Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries
  • C19 – TPS applicants
  • C08 – asylum applicants
  • C09 – adjustment-of-status applicants, and
  • C11 – parolees.

Previously, the report covered only EADs in the C11 parolee category.

DHS updates the report biweekly. When a current employee appears in the report, employers should compare the report’s Revoked Document Number with the EAD number used for the employee’s Form I-9 and E-Verify case. If the document numbers match, the employer must immediately begin reverifying the employee’s work authorization using Form I‑9, Supplement B, and complete the process within a reasonable timeframe. Don’t create a new E-Verify case for reverification.

An employer that knowingly continues to employ individuals not authorized to work in the U.S. may face penalties under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Follow the Form I-9 reverification process and avoid taking adverse action before completing the required review.

The expanded report adds another reason to stay on top of Form I-9 requirements. ICE revised its Form I-9 inspection guidance in March 2026, reclassifying more than 10 categories of errors previously treated as technical or procedural violations as substantive violations. Technical or procedural violations generally carry at least a 10-business-day correction period after ICE identifies them; substantive violations may trigger immediate monetary penalties. For Form I-9 paperwork violations, the penalty range is $288 to $2,861 per violation, effective Jan. 2, 2025.

More info: USCIS I‑9 Central Announcement

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]