• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Fired by text – what a $400K termination mistake looks like

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: November 6, 2023
2 minute engagement
Workers collect six-figure payout after being fired over text

As an HR pro, you’ve probably accepted that letting employees go is tough – but it’s part of the job. And you’ve likely figured out strategies for handling termination meetings.  

But what if a supervisor goes rogue – and fires employees over text messages?  

That’s not a good look, as an employer in Nevada recently learned the hard way. And when the EEOC got involved, it found even bigger problems.  

New employees face harassment  

Two Black employees, a married couple, were hired to work at a repair facility in Nevada in January of 2020. They were supervised by two white supervisors who were siblings.  

The employees said they were subjected to constant harassment from the two supervisors. Specifically, they said they endured racial taunts and slurs, including the N-word. They also said the supervisors regularly denigrated other Black workers on the basis of their race.  

Moreover, they said the alleged conduct happened openly, in front of co-workers and managers.  

Fired by text

The two employees said they complained to senior leaders, but the problems continued. At that point, they said they escalated their complaint to a vice president, who also “failed to take adequate steps to end the harassment.”  

Shortly after they complained to the C-suite, the two employees were fired via text by one of the white supervisors accused of harassment.  

EEOC issues warning: ‘Leaders set company culture’  

The EEOC filed a lawsuit on behalf of the fired employees, alleging racial harassment and retaliation.  

In the EEOC’s view, this alleged conduct amounted to a violation of Title VII, which prohibits race-based harassment and requires employers to investigate allegations of misconduct and promptly take action to end the harassment when necessary.  

“Leaders set company culture by the language and conduct they choose to tolerate as well as the behavior they model,” EEOC San Francisco District Director Nancy Sienko said in a press release. “Federal civil rights laws mandate that employers act promptly and effectively to stop race-based harassment, and the EEOC will hold employers accountable if they fail to meet their obligations.”  

Ultimately, the company agreed to pay $400,000 to the two employees. Under a three-year consent decree, it also agreed to:

  • Retain a consultant to improve and implement policies and procedures prohibiting racial harassment and retaliation.
  • Establish a comprehensive and effective complaint process.
  • Hold supervisors and managers accountable for their compliance with these measures.
  • Train its employees, supervisors and managers on anti-discrimination laws and PRC’s revised EEO policies and procedures.
  • Ensure that employees designated to conduct racial discrimination and harassment investigations also receive investigative training.

Info: PRC Industries pays $400K to settle EEOC racial harassment, retaliation lawsuit, 10/26/23.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Healthcare Affordability Pulse

Provided by HealthEquity

White Papers

HSA Survey & Myths Infographic

Webinars

The Recipe for Growth: Slim Chickens CEO Tom Gordon on Scalability and Succession Planning

Provided by Paycom

White Papers

Is Your Reporting Volume a Good Sign or a Warning Sign?

Provided by Navex

SPONSORED CONTENT

Benefits

Staff Administration

sponsored content
PEO ROI: 3 Numbers to Know Before You Leave Patchwork HR

Courtesy of TRINET

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Retention Strategies: 5 That Work When You Can’t Pay More

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Speak-Up Culture: 3 Signs Your Hotline Volume Is a Warning

Courtesy of NAVEX

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Form I-9: New Guidance to Verify Work Authorization

When a new hire provides federally-required Form I-9 documentation that indicates they’re authorized to work in the U.S., how do you ...

  • Employment Law
She claimed retaliation, but she was missing this 1 simple thing

To prove unlawful retaliation, three critical requirements must be met. And when any one of them is missing, the retaliation claim cannot s...

  • Employment Law
Employers in This State Just Got Some Great Workers’ Comp News

A workers’ comp ruling from Ohio’s highest court reverses decades of precedent and shortens the period during which total temporary dis...

  • Employment Law
Lessons from the Hollywood strike: 3 valuable takeaways for HR

Hollywood’s latest drama – a simultaneous strike by screenwriters and actors – hasn’t been seen since 1960, before most of ...

  • Employment Law
New OSHA Rule Lets Union Reps Participate in Safety Inspections

A new OSHA rule – the so-called “walkaround” rule – clarifies that employees may designate a non-employee third party, such as a un...

  • Employment Law
New EEOC Report: Agency Secured $660M for Workers in FY 2025

In FY 2025, the EEOC secured $660 million for workers who reported employment discrimination – and most of that money was recovered befor...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.