• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Google to Shell Out $28M to Settle Pay Equity Class Action Lawsuit

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: March 24, 2025
3 minute engagement
qual pay lawsuit ends with big payout
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

A leaked spreadsheet helped secure a $28 million equal pay settlement. Here’s what happened, according to a press release from Gunn Coble LLP, a civil rights law firm in Los Angeles.

Google has agreed to pay $28 million to settle a class action lawsuit claiming that it favored white and Asian employees by paying them more than workers of other ethnicities. A superior court in California granted preliminary approval on March 12. 

Google has denied the allegations, despite reaching the settlement to end the case. 

Lawsuit: Google Used Salary Histories to Set Starting Pay

In 2021, Ana Cantu, who identifies as Mexican and racially Indigenous, left her job at Google after seven years in the company’s people operations and cloud departments. 

She sued the company, claiming it paid diverse new hires less and placed them in lower-level jobs than their White, Asian and Asian-American colleagues in similar roles.

Moreover, the lawsuit alleged the pay disparities occurred, in part, because Google based new hires’ starting pay and level assignment on prior salaries, which reflected historical pay disparities based on race and ethnicity.

In Cantu’s view, Google’s alleged conduct amounted to violations of the California Equal Pay Act. 

She filed the lawsuit on behalf of herself and similarly situated current and former employees.

Leaked Spreadsheet Surfaces

To support her claim, Cantu relied on a 2022 leaked internal Google pay spreadsheet, which showed that diverse employees were paid less than their White, Asian, and Asian-American co-workers for similar work. 

A labor economist later confirmed these findings by analyzing Google’s payroll data, according to Gunn Coble.

“I commend Ms. Cantu who brought this suit against Google, one of the most powerful companies in the world. She risked her career to raise race/ethnicity pay disparity at Google,” Cathy Coble, founding partner of Gunn Coble LLP, said in a statement. “I also want to acknowledge the bravery of both the diverse and ally Googlers who self-reported their pay and leaked that data to the media, enabling us to push for discovery of the data necessary to support this class action. Suspected pay inequity is too easily concealed without this kind of collective action from employees.”

Google Also Agrees to Review Pay Practices

As part of the agreement, Google has committed to work with both a labor economist and an occupational psychologist, who will evaluate the company’s yearly pay equity reviews and its hiring processes related to assigning initial job levels. Their suggestions will be considered to address the claims brought forward in the case.

Takeaways for HR

This settlement over pay disparities offers critical takeaways for HR professionals. Here are the key lessons from the case:

1. Salary History Policies Can Perpetuate Pay Gaps

The lawsuit alleged that Google’s practice of basing starting pay on prior salaries led to racial and ethnic pay disparities. 

Many states, including California, now ban salary history inquiries for this reason. HR teams should ensure their compensation policies comply with such laws and focus on pay equity from the start.

2. Pay Transparency Matters

A leaked internal pay spreadsheet played a pivotal role in the dispute. 

This highlights the growing importance of pay transparency – whether through legal obligations or employee-led efforts. 

Proactively conducting pay audits and sharing findings internally can help organizations stay ahead of potential issues – before issues develop into costly legal disputes.

3. Independent Pay Equity Reviews Strengthen Compliance

As part of the settlement, Google agreed to work with a labor economist and an occupational psychologist to review pay and hiring practices. 

Regular check-ins on compensation packages across the company is a good best practice, Jamila S. Mensah, partner at Norton Rose Fulbright, said in a recent conversation with HRMorning.

HR leaders should consider engaging third-party experts to audit pay structures and ensure fair hiring practices.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Building an Incident Management Program? Start With These Four Fundamentals

Provided by Navex

Webinars

Beyond Compliance: Building Trust Through AI Governance in HR

Provided by Paycom

White Papers

HSA Survey & Myths Infographic

White Papers

One Botched Harassment Investigation Away From a Lawsuit

Provided by Navex

SPONSORED CONTENT

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Benefits

Staff Administration

sponsored content
PEO ROI: 3 Numbers to Know Before You Leave Patchwork HR

Courtesy of TRINET

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Supreme Court Deals New Blow to Agency Power, Kills 40-Year-Old Rule

A new U.S. Supreme Court washes away a 40-year-old rule that gave federal agencies broad power to fill in the blanks when federal laws are ...

  • Employment Law
5 lawsuits in 5 days: EEOC goes on warpath with new ADA filings

An onslaught of new lawsuits filed by the EEOC near the end of September demonstrates the wide scope of protection afforded to applicants a...

  • Employment Law
Restaurant Forks Over $600K to End Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Four female employees in Washington state said they endured ongoing sexual harassment at work – but management didn’t do anything to st...

  • Compensation
  • Employment Law
Pay Transparency Best Practices That Build Trust and Cut Risk

More employees feel left in the dark about their pay than HR leaders might expect: 22% disagree and another 29% strongly disagree that thei...

  • Employment Law
Dual-Role Scheduling & Overtime: New DOL Opinion Letter FLSA2026-5

Does dual-role scheduling put your overtime compliance at risk? A new DOL opinion letter says it depends on the specific facts of the arran...

  • Employment Law
Noncompete Agreement Might Be OK — Here’s Why

Idaho’s highest court negated a lower court ruling that said a doctor’s noncompete agreement could not be enforced. The case was sent b...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | HRMorning Insider? Manage your subscription
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.