• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Jury Awards Nike Ex-Employee More Than $15M in Sex Discrimination Case

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: July 30, 2026
1 minute engagement
qual pay lawsuit ends with big payout
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

A federal jury in Oregon found that Nike discriminated against former employee Heather Hender by paying her less than male colleagues and delaying her promotions, in violation of federal and state laws. 

In 2018, Hender and three other female employees sued Nike, alleging sex discrimination. The lawsuit claimed they were paid, on average, about $11,000 less than male co-workers and that Nike’s HR department failed to address their concerns.

Jury Hears Sex Discrimination Case

The other plaintiffs settled, leaving Hender’s claims to proceed to trial. After a six-day trial, the jury awarded Hender:

  • $19,739.52 in back pay for Equal Pay Act violations
  • $7.5 million in punitive damages under Title VII, and
  • $7.5 million in punitive damages under Oregon law.

This is yet another seven-figure verdict that highlights the potential liability employers face when compensation decisions and promotion practices are challenged as discriminatory.

More info: Hender v. Nike verdict form

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

The FMLA Paperwork Trap: Why Manual Leave Management Is Costing You More Than Time

Provided by AbsenceSoft

White Papers

The Employer Growth Standard

Provided by Asure Software

Webinars

Upskill, Reskill and Retain: How to Future-Proof Your Workforce

Provided by PAYCOM

White Papers

Recruiting Got AI. Leave Got a Form Template.

SPONSORED CONTENT

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Benefits

Staff Administration

sponsored content
PEO ROI: 3 Numbers to Know Before You Leave Patchwork HR

Courtesy of TRINET

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Opioid use and the workplace: How employers can get in trouble

As the opioid epidemic continues to take a grim toll, workplace issues relating to opioid use remain more likely to arise. For HR pros, mis...

  • Employment Law
  • Leadership & Strategy
ICE Visit at Your Workplace: How HR Should Respond

ICE activity is again drawing widespread attention, with enforcement actions that carry direct implications for employers. An ICE visit is ...

  • Employment Law
What Does Retaliatory Behavior at Work Look Like?

At some point in your career as an HR pro, you’ve probably seen a manager who got bent out of shape about an employee’s accusation of d...

  • Employment Law
EEOC updates COVID-19 guidance: What you need to know

Saying it is the “capstone” of its resources on the subject, the EEOC has issued another update to its COVID-19 guidance. Demonstrat...

  • Employment Law
Appeals Court: NLRB Got This One Wrong

A new ruling from a federal appeals court is a victory for an employer and a sharp blow to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Th...

  • Employment Law
Worker Falls From 8-Story Water Tower: $485K OSHA Fine

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has cited a New Jersey water tower painting company for three willful and 19 serio...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | HRMorning Insider? Manage your subscription
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.