• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Workers Exposed to Deadly Fall Hazards Twice in 2 Months

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: June 17, 2024
2 minute engagement
OSHA Finds Safety Hazards, Fines Trader Joe’s Nearly $217K

A recent study found that falls are among the costliest workplace injuries. In fact, they’re in the top three workplace injuries with the highest compensation payouts.

So when it comes to protecting workers from deadly fall hazards, most employers stand firm on safety training requirements and the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE).

When workers aren’t protected from fall hazards, employers may face expensive fines, as this recent case shows.

Inspectors spot deadly fall hazards

In Illinois, OSHA inspectors observed Maestro Construction Inc. employees doing framing work at two homes under construction. The employees were working at heights up to 20 feet without adequate fall protection. Inspectors noted that some workers put on fall protection PPE but wore it incorrectly, making it useless.

OSHA inspectors also learned the company failed to certify the employees had been trained in fall hazards or the required use of PPE. In addition, they found damaged electrical cords in use.

The incidents occurred on two separate occasions, in December 2023 and February 2024.

Contractor is a repeat offender

What’s more, this wasn’t the first time Maestro Construction Inc. caught the feds’ attention. The agency cited Maestro Construction four times in 2023 for fall-related violations.

And the contractor has been cited seven times since 2020, according to a DOL press release.

OSHA proposes $264K fine

OSHA proposed $264,407 in penalties for:

  • Two willful violations
  • Two repeat violations
  • Two serious violations, and
  • One other-than-serious violation.

“Contractors like Maestro Construction that willfully ignore federal safety standards for fall protection are endangering the lives and well-being of their employees,” said OSHA Area Director Jacob Scott in Naperville, Illinois. “Despite being cited seven times since 2020, this company continues to show a callous disregard for their employees’ safety, and we will continue to hold them accountable for their defiance of regulations.”

Fall prevention requirements

Employers must set up workspaces to prevent employees from falling from overhead platforms, elevated workstations or into holes in the floor and walls.

OSHA requires fall protection be provided beginning at elevations of:

  • 4 feet in general industry workplaces
  • 5 feet in shipyards
  • 6 feet in the construction industry, and
  • 8 feet in longshoring operations.

Moreover, OSHA requires fall protection to be provided when employees are working above dangerous equipment and machinery, regardless of the fall distance.

Info: Contractor exposes employees to deadly fall hazards twice in 2 months, 6/12/24.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Unconventional Benefits: An Employer’s Guide

Provided by Paycom

Webinars

Implementing a Hybrid Work Strategy that Makes Sense for Your Business

Webinars

Surviving as a One Person HR Department in a Post-Pandemic World

Webinars

2026 Workplace Compliance Trends to Watch

Provided by Paycom

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
DoorDash’s $16.75M Payout: A Warning on Tips & Transparency

DoorDash has agreed to pay $16.75 million to settle a dispute involving its practices on handling delivery workers’ tips, New York Attorn...

  • Employment Law
Costly FLSA ‘hot goods’ lesson: Company pays $1.1M for contractors’ illegal wage practices

Beyond Yoga recently paid more than $1.1 million to cover back wages and damages owed to its contractors’ employees who were allegedly sh...

  • Employment Law
An $11.25M mistake: Why jury sides with fired worker who complained about harassment

A recent lawsuit provides a case study on what NOT to do when handling employee complaints. How bad was it? A jury awarded an eight-figure ...

  • Employment Law
Walmart on the hook for $60K in sex stereotyping case

Walmart has agreed to pay $60,000 and take other steps to resolve charges that it violated federal law by denying a promotion to an employe...

  • Compensation
  • Employment Law
Supreme Court Delivers Big Win for Military Reservist in Pay Dispute

A Coast Guard reservist who is also a federal employee was entitled to differential pay while on active duty, the Supreme Court has ruled. ...

  • Employment Law
Are Trump’s Executive Orders Really Affecting Private Employers? 5 Reality Checks

In January, Donald Trump’s first-day executive orders targeted federal agencies and threatened to trickle down to private employers. ...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.