Independent Contractors or Employees? New Court Ruling Focuses on Control
By
Misclassifying employees as independent contractors can leave employers facing significant wage-and-hour liability.
DMV Protection LLC is a security service company that provides security personnel for clients.
Except for the owner, everyone at DMV – from security guards to the director of operations – is classified as an independent contractor (IC). Guards must sign an IC Agreement and an IC Handbook, which are DMV’s only written policy documents.
DMV pays guards $16.50 to $22 an hour, without overtime premiums. The owner set pay rates based on client rates, with no evidence guards negotiated pay. Guards made no upfront investment. Instead, DMV provided guards with branded uniforms, radios, badges, keys, vehicles and gas.
How Much Control Over Independent Contractors Is Too Much?
The company assigned guards to client locations and typically established regular schedules. Guards couldn’t hire their own employees or subcontract shifts without supervisor approval. DMV used an app that required guards to clock in and out at every site, gave guards work instructions and conducted periodic check-ins; it also used GPS tracking and in-person site visits to supervise guards.
Guards were penalized for arriving late, leaving early, not wearing uniforms, smoking and using phones for non-work purposes. Penalties included pay deductions, suspensions and terminations.
In 2025, a guard filed a class action alleging misclassification and unpaid overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state law.
The court found DMV exercised extensive control over guards’ work. That control weighed heavily against IC classification.
Other factors also supported employee status: Guards had little opportunity to increase earnings through business decisions because DMV set their hourly rates; security work was integral to DMV’s sole business; and DMV provided the equipment guards needed to perform their jobs. The ruling advances guards’ unpaid overtime claims.
Takeaways: An IC agreement doesn’t determine worker status. How a business operates – particularly who sets rates, assigns schedules, tracks time, supervises performance and imposes discipline – matters more.
More info: Rangel v. DMV Protection LLC
Further Reading
FMLA Intermittent Leave: 8 Questions HR Asks Most
Partial days, doctor’s notes, late arrivals. If intermittent FMLA leave keeps you guessing, these eight answers can help clear things up for HR.
Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K
A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]
Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps
Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]
USCIS Plans to Abolish 60-Day Grace Period for Certain Nonimmigrant Workers
On Sept. 11, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if adopted, would eliminate the 60-day grace period currently granted to most nonimmigrant workers in H-1B, H-1B1, E-1, E-2, E-3, L-1, O-1 or TN status who abruptly lose their positions. The grace period has been in place since […]
Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims
Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]
Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny
Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]