• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

OSHA: Employer Could’ve Prevented 62-Year-Old’s Deadly Fall

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: June 24, 2024
1 minute engagement
OSHA Finds Safety Hazards, Fines Trader Joe’s Nearly $217K
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

A mobile home manufacturer in Alabama could’ve prevented a 62-year-old roofing laborer’s fatal fall if the employer had followed OSHA’s fall protection standards, a federal investigation found.

Because the employer failed to do so, it now faces a hefty penalty on top of dealing with the tragedy. Here’s what happened, according to OSHA.

OSHA finds serious violations

The investigation determined a 62-year-old roofing laborer for Kabco Builders Inc. was working alone while loading shingles. The employee slipped and fell approximately 10 feet while straddling a two-foot-wide space between a platform and the roof of a mobile home.

The employee died at a nearby hospital.

OSHA cited Kabco Builders with 10 serious violations for hazards, including:

  • not providing workers with fall protection
  • failure to train workers performing roof work at heights of four feet or more
  • not providing training to workers who operate forklifts
  • not requiring workers applying adhesives to wear personal protective equipment (PPE), and
  • not training workers on the hazards related to the chemicals in use.

The agency proposed $81,463 in penalties.

“As falls from heights continue to be the leading cause of fatalities and serious injuries in all industries, employers like Kabco Builders must know and understand the importance of fall protection standards and related training,” said OSHA Area Office Director Joel Batiz in Birmingham, Alabama. “Following these well-established safety requirements can mean the difference between an employer seeing its worker ending a shift safely or having to watch as a worker’s family, friends and co-workers grieve a needless tragedy.”

Kabco Builders Inc. abated the cited hazards and paid the penalty, according to OSHA.

Slip-and-fall accidents are among the most common – and most expensive – workplace injuries.

Info: DOL Cites Boaz Mobile Home Manufacturer After 62-Year-Old Worker Suffers Fatal Trauma After 10-Foot Fall, 6/20/24.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Is Your Compensation Management Plan Up to Snuff?

Provided by Marsh

White Papers

2026 Fertility Vendor Evaluation Guide for Benefits Leaders

Provided by Maven Clinic

White Papers

Harvard Business Review AI Talent Playbook

White Papers

How Employee Spending is Changing the Benefits Landscape

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

Talent Management

sponsored content
AI Skills Gap: The 2026 Questions HR Leaders Are Asking, Answered

Courtesy of TRINET

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
ERISA Plan Docs: Are You Doing What the Law Requires?

Among the more head-spinning laws HR has to grapple with, the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) ranks near the top of the l...

  • Employment Law
JCPenney Settles EEOC Lawsuit Over Firing of Worker with Breast Cancer: $99K Payout

When employers outsource leave administration to a third-party administrator (TPA), legal responsibility remains with the employer – as a...

  • Employment Law
Highly Compensated Employee Files FLSA Lawsuit: Here’s Why

Having trouble deciding whether an employee is exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)? A ruling from a federal appeals court in a...

  • Employment Law
EEOC Suit Ends With $1M Payout: Don’t Make This Mistake

An EEOC suit filed against a government contractor has ended with an agreement that calls for the contractor to pay more than $1 million an...

  • Benefits
  • Employment Law
SECURE Act 2.0: What HR needs to know

On January 1st, provisions to the SECURE Act 2.0, part of the 2023 omnibus spending bill, went into effect – and it may affect your benef...

  • Employment Law
$113K FLSA Settlement: DOL Probe Finds Retaliation, Overtime Mistakes

An urgent care facility in Georgia has agreed to pay $113,199 to resolve alleged violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)....

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.