• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

OSHA Backs Driver Who Reported Safety Issues

Tom D'Agostino
By: Tom D'Agostino
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

Tom D’Agostino is an attorney and legal editor who has more than 30 years of experience writing about employment law, disability law and education law trends. He earned his B.A. degree from Ramapo College of New Jersey and his J.D. from the Duquesne University School of Law. D’Agostino, who is a member of the Pennsylvania bar, is a past member of the American Bar Association’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities and the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Legal Services to Persons with Disabilities Committee. He has provided technical assistance in the production of segments for television’s ABC World News and 20/20, and he has been quoted in periodicals including USA Today. He is also a past contributing author of Legal Rights of Persons with Disabilities: An Analysis of Federal Law, which is a comprehensive two-volume treatise addressing the legal rights of people with disabilities. Tom is passionate about baseball and authentic Italian food. When not writing, he enjoys spending time with family.

Show Less
Last Updated: September 18, 2024
4 minute engagement
safety policy violated the law
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

A truck driver was illegally fired for reporting legitimate safety issues, the Department of Labor (DOL) has determined.

OSHA has ordered the employer to pay back wages with interest as well as compensatory and punitive damages.

The agency’s federal whistleblower investigation targeted W-L Construction & Paving Inc., which is a subsidiary of CRH — which in turn is a global provider of building materials solutions.

Safety Issues and a Broken Tooth

The DOL said that on July 12, 2023, while driving to work, the unnamed driver broke his tooth while biting into a sandwich. Though he made it to work, he told his supervisor when he got there that he needed to leave due to his dental emergency.

The next day, the driver told his supervisor that he would not be able to work due to pain from the dental emergency. He said he did not feel safe operating a commercial motor vehicle because his face was swollen and he was having problems with his vision.

Eight days later, the driver left work after finishing an eight-hour shift. About an hour later, his supervisor asked him to return so that he could haul another load. The driver said no, citing safety issues and explaining that he had been drinking and was not able to drive.

More Health Issues

At the end of August of 2023, the driver called in to work to say he could not work because he was coughing up blood, further highlighting safety issues.

Near the end of September, W-L’s general manager terminated the driver’s employment.

The driver contacted HR and said he had been terminated for his complaints relating to hours of service. HR initially changed the termination to a suspension, but it terminated the driver in early October of 2023 based on its finding that he was terminated based on poor attendance.

More specifically, the employer said the driver accumulated 10 attendance infractions between July and September of 2023.

Policy? What Policy?

OSHA said three of those 10 infractions were related to safety issues and the driver’s protected refusals to drive. It also said that though the employer supposedly has a policy calling for termination after three consecutive absences or no-shows without proper notification, it does not consistently enforce the policy.

Moreover, OSHA said, the driver never had three consecutive absences or no-shows without proper notification. He told his supervisor when he would late or absent, OSHA said.

The agency said the driver engaged in protected activity when he complained about hours of service near the end of April of 2023 and when he told his employer on two separate occasions that he was too sick to drive. These were legitimate safety issues.

OSHA determined that the driver’s engagement in those protected activities were a contributing factor in the decision to terminate his employment.

OSHA Faults Employer for Safety Issues

The employer did not provide enough evidence to show it would have terminated the driver’s employment if he did not engage in the protected activity, the agency determined.

It said the driver and his family have “suffered tremendously” due to the employer’s illegal conduct and that it was appropriate to award both compensatory and punitive damages.

The agency ordered the employer to pay $56,558.95 as of September 11, 2024, with that amount growing each week until reinstatement is offered.

It also ordered payments of $1,759.30 in interest, $115,694.19 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in punitive damages.

It further ordered the employer to pay the driver’s reasonable attorneys’ fees.

The agency also banned the employer from retaliating against the driver and ordered it to post a notice about the case for employees.

Employers Are Accountable

“W-L Construction & Paving Inc. illegally retaliated against an employee who raised legitimate concerns about their ability to meet the company’s demands without jeopardizing their safety or that of others,” said OSHA Regional Administrator Michael J. Rivera in Philadelphia. “Our nation’s supply chain and economy depend on commercial drivers operating their rigs safely to deliver their cargo. OSHA will hold employers accountable when they ignore workers’ concerns about their safety and that of others. Workers should know speaking freely without fear of retaliation when safety is compromised is protected right under federal law.”

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

The True Cost of a Delayed Diagnosis

Provided by Maven Clinic

White Papers

Recruiting Got AI. Leave Got a Form Template.

Webinars

Your Policy Changed. Did Employee Behavior?

Provided by Navex

EBOOK, White Papers

The Prevention Mandate: An Employer’s Framework for a Healthier Workforce

Provided by Personify Health

SPONSORED CONTENT

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
New FMLA Ruling Puts HR On Notice About Expectant Fathers’ Leave Rights

A new ruling in a case from Alabama provides valuable insight for HR pros on the requirements of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). ...

  • Employment Law
No Disability? No Problem! Appeals Court Green-Lights ADA Claim for Back Pay

The cost of violating ADA rules about medical inquiries and exams can get potentially steep. It may include back pay – even if the employ...

  • Employment Law
HR leader said what!? Questionable comment at ‘Leadership Town Hall’ results in $2.4M payout

As an HR professional, you know that words matter – a lot. And you’re probably mindful of how you speak about employees and applicants ...

  • Employment Law
Fired for asking to get paid? Check out this new NLRB ruling

A new NLRB ruling says an employee was improperly fired for asking “the most basic of employee questions.” The question, in essence: Wh...

  • Employment Law
Oregon Law Will Reduce Leave Stacking, Effective July 1

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek signed into law SB 1515, which amends the Oregon Family Leave Act (OFLA) and the Paid Leave Oregon (PLO) program. ...

  • Employment Law
DOL Proposes New Rule on Joint Employer Liability

On April 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division (WHD) released a proposed rule for determining when multip...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.