• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Repeated complaints about sexual harassment: Key mistake in response leads to $400K payout

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: February 6, 2023
1 minute engagement
Workers Say Harassment Was Severe
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

The McDonald Oil Company agreed to pay $400,000 to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit, the EEOC announced in a press release.

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, the Georgia-based company “ignored frequent complaints from multiple female employees and customers about ongoing sexual harassment by a male employee” who worked in two locations in Alabama.

How NOT to respond to sexual harassment

The lawsuit alleged that “multiple managers” were aware of the alleged harassment, but they failed to respond in a way that corrected “the hostile work environment.” The company’s mistake, according to the EEOC, was that it “chose to transfer the harasser to another store,” where he allegedly continued to harass female employees, rather than address the issue.

Specifically, the suit claimed the accused harasser:

  • Subjected female employees and customers to unwanted sexual touching
  • Made sexual comments about their bodies
  • Asked questions about their sex lives
  • Solicited co-workers for sex
  • Disrobed at work, and
  • Circulated nude and semi-nude photos of himself at work.

Ultimately, the man’s conduct resulted in his criminal prosecution.

The company has agreed to pay $400,000 to five female employees who alleged they suffered “severe mental anguish and emotional distress” due to the ongoing harassment. Under a three-year consent decree, the company will also:

  • Revise its policies and procedures to prevent future incidents of sex-based harassment
  • Provide training to managers on proper ways to document and investigate complaints of sexual harassment.
  • Provide training to employees on their right to work in an environment free from sex-based harassment.

Info: McDonald Oil Company to Pay $400,000 to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit, 1/25/23.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

HBR Research Report: Improving Business Performance Through Appreciation

Provided by Achievers

White Papers

HSA Survey & Myths Infographic

White Papers

Recruiting Got AI. Leave Got a Form Template.

White Papers

Are Your ADA and PWFA Processes Putting You at Risk?

Provided by AbsenceSoft

SPONSORED CONTENT

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
State Slams Costco With Six-Figure Misclassification Penalty

State regulators in California have imposed a substantial misclassification penalty on a global employer. It’s yet another reminder f...

  • Employment Law
Transgender Worker Wins Health Care Fight – But Is Not Done Yet

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a lower court’s ruling that an employer cannot exclude gender-affirming coverage for a transgender plan par...

  • Employment Law
The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act & the Fight for Pay Equity

Lilly Ledbetter, a former Goodyear employee who became the face of the pay equity movement, died last month at age 86.  Here’s a ...

  • Employment Law
DEI Policy Concerns? HR’s 5-Step Guide, From a Former EEOC Attorney

President Trump’s executive orders aiming to dismantle DEI initiatives in the public and private sectors have caused widespread debates a...

  • Employment Law
Questionable FMLA Certification? 5 Ways to Fix the Problem

Pop quiz: Do you know what to do with incomplete or unclear Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) certifications? Most HR pros agree that...

  • Employment Law
Disability Discrimination: Manager’s ‘ADD Brain’ Comments Keep Claim Alive

Some manager mistakes begin with an attempt to help — and then land companies in court. In this case, a supervisor supported an...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.