• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Costly mistake – court orders bakeries to pay nearly $1M in back wages, plus penalties

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: October 5, 2022
2 minute engagement
74 Employees Awarded Back Wages Damages

A Connecticut federal court has ordered three bakeries to pay nearly $1 million in back wages and damages to 74 employees to resolve violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The suit was prompted by an investigation by the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division, which determined the three bakeries — Padaminas NY Bakery II, LLC; Padaminas NY Bakery, LLC; and Padaminas Brazilian Bakery, Inc. – “willfully violated” the FLSA’s overtime requirements.

Specifically, it found the bakeries paid employees who worked more than 40 hours per week straight time rather than time-and-a-half for their overtime hours. The bakeries also failed to comply with recordkeeping requirements, the DOL found.

Expensive mistake: Back wages, damages, penalties

The court ordered the bakeries to pay $476,216.70 in back wages and another $476,216.70 in liquidated damages to the affected employees. It also tacked on another $41,568.33 in civil penalties that will go to the DOL under Section 16(e) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 21, due to the “willful” nature of the violations.

The court’s order also:

  • prohibits the bakeries from violating the FLSA’s overtime and recordkeeping requirements
  • requires them to cooperate with the DOL’s FLSA investigations, including providing truthful responses, info and documents to investigators, and  
  • prohibits them from soliciting employees to “kick back” the wages or damages.

As an FYI, the majority of the affected employees worked as bakers and counter staff. Last year, the food service industry topped the DOL’s Low Wage, High Violation Industries list, with the DOL recovering back wages for 29,209 food service workers. The construction industry took the No. 2 spot (with 21,341 affected workers), and the healthcare industry rounded out the top three (17,079).

The FLSA requires that most employees be paid at least the federal minimum wage for all hours worked and overtime pay at not less than time and one-half the regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a single workweek.

Walsh v. Padaminas NY Bakery II, LLC, No. 3:22-cv-00999 (D. Conn. 10/3/22).

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

TriNet AI in HR eGuide 2026

White Papers

Are Your ADA and PWFA Processes Putting You at Risk?

Provided by AbsenceSoft

White Papers

The New Rules of Engagement: Rethinking How Employees Connect to Work

Provided by Inspirus

White Papers

Monthly Employee Engagement Ideas

Provided by Inspirus

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
OSHA Backs Driver Who Reported Safety Issues

A truck driver was illegally fired for reporting legitimate safety issues, the Department of Labor (DOL) has determined. OSHA has o...

  • Employment Law
Forced Retirement? EEOC Lawsuit Cost Employer $250K

Age discrimination isn’t always obvious; it can sometimes be subtle, such as when employees face pressure to retire earlier than plan...

  • Employment Law
ERISA lawsuit: Feds sue HR director, now-defunct company over missing 401(k) funds  

As an HR pro, you’ve probably heard about the significant responsibilities that come with acting as fiduciary for a benefits plan.  ...

  • Employment Law
Top 5 Severance Agreement Mistakes Employers Make

When employers decide to part ways with employees, they often choose the route of offering up a severance agreement. A severance agreeme...

  • Employment Law
Jury Awards Nike Ex-Employee More Than $15M in Sex Discrimination Case

A federal jury in Oregon found that Nike discriminated against former employee Heather Hender by paying her less than male colleagues and d...

  • Employment Law
ADA accommodation: Do you have to help employees with their commute?

Does an employer’s ADA accommodation duty extend so far as to require it to change an employee’s job schedule to help with their commut...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.