• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

What a $250K retaliation mistake looks like

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: December 28, 2022
3 minute engagement
RetaliationMistakeLeadsToCostlyPayout

Race discrimination is bad enough, but an Oklahoma-based company recently learned the hard way that adding a retaliation mistake on top of that can lead to hefty settlements.

American Piping Inspection, Inc. has agreed to pay $250,000 to settle a race-based discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed by the EEOC on behalf of a Black employee who was fired.

The employee worked at a company office located in Midland, Texas. The EEOC’s lawsuit alleged that the employee was subjected to racist remarks by his supervisor, who was white. The discrimination allegedly started on the employee’s first day on the job and continued throughout his time at the company.

Among other things, the supervisor allegedly:

  • used the N-word when referring to the employee and other minority employees
  • made offensive racist “jokes” in the presence of the employee, and
  • mocked the employee for being offended.

The employee complained to the company’s vice president. Even so, the supervisor allegedly continued to use racial slurs and make racially offensive comments. In one instance at the end of a company gathering, the supervisor told racist jokes while looking at the employee and used his hand to pretend to shoot a gun at the employee, the suit claimed.

Feeling threatened, the employee said he again complained to the company’s vice president. However, no corrective action was taken, the suit alleged.

Instead, the employee said that company leaders began to scrutinize and discipline him more harshly than his white colleagues. And about a month later, he was fired.

In September of 2021, the EEOC filed a Title VII suit on behalf of the employee, alleging a racially hostile work environment. The complaint sought back pay as well as compensatory and punitive damages.

Under the terms of the settlement, American Piping Inspection, Inc. agreed to:

  • pay $250,000 to the employee
  • revise its anti-discrimination policies and distribute the updated policies to all employees and new hires
  • provide Title VII training to all managers and HR staff regarding their legal obligations to prevent, address and remedy workplace discrimination and retaliation
  • post a discrimination notice and EEO posters at all its worksites, and
  • submit periodic compliance reports to EEOC for a duration of three years.

As you know, companies cannot take an “adverse employment action” against an employee for asserting their EEO rights – which is sometimes called “engaging in a protected activity.”

But what exactly is an “adverse employment action” by EEOC standards?

Guidance from EEOC: What a retaliation mistake might look like

Unfortunately, there is no cut-and-dried list of what is — and isn’t — actionable, as the “circumstances of each case determine whether a particular action is retaliatory in that context,” the EEOC says.

However, the agency has provided examples that may be considered retaliatory “adverse employment actions,” such as:

  • work-related threats, warnings or reprimands
  • negative or lowered evaluations
  • transfers to less prestigious or desirable work or work locations
  • making false reports to government authorities or in the media
  • filing a civil action
  • threatening reassignment
  • scrutinizing work or attendance more closely than that of other employees, without justification
  • removing supervisory responsibilities
  • engaging in abusive verbal or physical behavior that is reasonably likely to deter protected activity, even if it is not yet “severe or pervasive” as required for a hostile work environment
  • requiring re-verification of work status, making threats of deportation or initiating other action with immigration authorities because of protected activity
  • terminating a union grievance process or other action to block access to otherwise available remedial mechanisms, or
  • taking (or threatening to take) a materially adverse action against a close family member (who would then also have a retaliation claim, even if not an employee).

For more info, check out the EEOC’s Facts About Retaliation.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Monthly Employee Engagement Ideas

Provided by Inspirus

Webinars

Keep It Simple: How to Reduce Unnecessary Workplace Complexity

Provided by Paycom

White Papers

HSA Employee Survey Kit

EBOOK, White Papers

Engage or Bust:  The Brutal Reality for Self-Funded Employers

Provided by Personify Health

SPONSORED CONTENT

Benefits

Staff Administration

sponsored content
PEO ROI: 3 Numbers to Know Before You Leave Patchwork HR

Courtesy of TRINET

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Retention Strategies: 5 That Work When You Can’t Pay More

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Speak-Up Culture: 3 Signs Your Hotline Volume Is a Warning

Courtesy of NAVEX

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Deadly Fall Hazards: Repeat Offender Faces New $317K Fine

When workers aren’t protected from deadly fall hazards, OSHA issues significant penalties, as this recent case from Illinois shows. KW...

  • Employment Law
EEOC sues over commute rule: Employee’s not allowed to Uber to work

When do employers’ ADA obligations kick in? Do compliance requirements start as soon as employees get to work? Or do they begin during th...

  • Employment Law
Obesity and the ADA: Does alleged fat-shaming at work prove discrimination?

Does obesity count as a disability protected under the law? That’s the question a Connecticut court recently faced. An employee su...

  • Employment Law
Pay Transparency Compliance Missteps Lead to $900K Payout

A $900,000 settlement in Washington shows how easily employers can stumble on pay transparency compliance when job postings lack required p...

  • Employment Law
Paternity leave benefits: What you need to know to get it right

Paternity leave – both paid and unpaid – provides multiple benefits for employers and employees alike. In the U.S., both mothers and...

  • Employment Law
Compensation in Flux: Crypto Pay, EU Transparency, and the Latest U.S. State Laws

The global compensation landscape is evolving at an extraordinary pace. From digital assets entering payroll discussions to sweeping transp...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.