Skip to main content

Using transgender employee’s deadname was harassment, court ruled

RM

By

Last updated November 6, 20242 min read
Using transgender employee’s deadname was harassment, court ruled

Back in 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that sex discrimination protections under the Civil Rights Act extended to sexual orientation and gender identity.

And a recent district court ruling reiterated that. Here’s a breakdown of the case.

Purposely misgendering

Vivian Fulwood, a transgender woman, began working at a Georgia Walmart store post-transition. She dressed and presented herself as female, and requested the company call her Vivian. Walmart agreed to this, and her nametag used her requested name, however the company used her birthname on official documents.

During Fulwood’s employment, managers refused to use her requested name and instead used her deadname in both conversations with her and about her. This resulted in many employees using Fulwood’s deadname and purposely misgendering her. Fulwood would correct her colleagues, but they refused to use her requested name.

Some employees even told Fulwood they “disagreed” with her identifying as transgender and would give her a hard time about using the women’s restroom. Other colleagues would ask inappropriate questions about her transition.

Fulwood filed a complaint, but Walmart did nothing to stop the harassing behavior. Eventually, Fulwood was fired for unexcused absences — though she claimed those had been approved. She then sued Walmart for sex discrimination and harassment.

Company encouraged harassment

The district court ruled in favor of Fulwood, stating she was protected under the Civil Rights Act, and the company not only failed to prevent the harassment, but encouraged it.

By permitting managers to use Fulwood’s deadname, it made employees aware of Fulwood’s transgender status, and sent the message it was OK to misgender her, the court said.

“The aforementioned conduct would not have occurred for Plaintiff’s sex, gender identity and identification as a transgender person,” the court added.

While this ruling is a win for transgender employees — and provides clear guidance to employers — there are a few transgender issues that remain legally murky, such as dress codes and bathroom usage. Employers will have to wait and see how more courts start ruling on these specific topics.

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]