• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Job offer revoked due to medical condition: Why it wasn’t an ADA violation

Rachel Mucha
By: Rachel Mucha
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

Rachel writes about Human Resource management and has been a member of the HRMorning staff since 2017. She is a graduate of Ithaca College.

Show Less
Last Updated: March 7, 2022
2 minute engagement
employee posed a direct threat
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

Employers know that refusing to accommodate or hire a disabled employee can end up being an ADA violation.

But what happens if the disabled person poses a danger to themselves and others?

A court addressed this issue in a recent lawsuit. Here’s a breakdown of the case.

Possibility of seizures

Russell Pontinen applied for a job at United States Steel Corporation in Indiana. He was eventually offered the job at the steel plant, in which he’d be operating torches, power tools and other heavy equipment.

After making the job offer, the employer discovered that Pontinen had a seizure disorder. It had been controlled with anti-seizure medication for many years, however Pontinen decided to stop taking his medication, against the advice of his doctor. This meant Pontinen was at high risk of a seizure.

The company took an in-depth look at Pontinen’s medical history and consulted with his doctor, ultimately concluding that Pontinen would be unable to perform his job safely. The job offer was revoked, citing Pontinen posed a direct threat to himself and his colleagues.

Pontinen sued, claiming a violation of the ADA.

Put everyone at risk

The Seventh Circuit ruled in favor of the employer. It said the company investigated Pontinen’s health issues fully before making the decision. The court reiterated Pontinen’s risk of seizures was high, and the nature of the job would be very dangerous for both himself and those around him if Pontinen were to lose consciousness during work.

Pontinen tried to argue that it had been years since he’d had a seizure, but the court said that him stopping his medication increased the risk of a seizure happening at any time.

The court’s decision is in line with the ADA, which permits employers to screen out a disabled employee if there is a “risk of substantial harm … that cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable accommodation.”

Direct threat assessment

So what can employers do if they find themselves in a similar situation as Pontinen and his employer? Here’s some advice from employment law attorney Fiona Ong of the firm Shawe Rosenthal LLP.

To properly make a direct threat assessment under the ADA, an employer can require an employee to undergo a medical assessment. It can also go over the employee’s medical history and speak with their doctor.

It would be wise to make a list of the job’s essential duties and how the employee’s condition may impact those as well.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Is Your Reporting Volume a Good Sign or a Warning Sign?

Provided by Navex

White Papers

Inspirus — The Mid-Market Retention Playbook: 5 Strategies That Work When You Can’t Just Pay More

Provided by Inspirus

White Papers

The Business Case for Maven Clinic

Provided by Maven Clinic

White Papers

Six Pillars to Drive Impactful Engagement

Provided by Terryberry

SPONSORED CONTENT

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Groundbreaking AI discrimination settlement: 3 key lessons for HR

The EEOC and iTutorGroup, Inc. have reached an agreement to resolve the first AI discrimination lawsuit. The EEOC’s complaint alleged ...

  • Employment Law
Disability Discrimination: Manager’s ‘ADD Brain’ Comments Keep Claim Alive

Some manager mistakes begin with an attempt to help — and then land companies in court. In this case, a supervisor supported an...

  • Employment Law
SHRM Owes $400K After Rescinding Job Offer Over Service Dog

SHRM has been found liable for failing to accommodate a job applicant who uses a service dog to manage Type 1 diabetes – a violation of t...

  • Employment Law
Independent contractors: 5 misconceptions HR may have

As the gig economy continues to grow and organizations seek to build their talent by hiring an independent contractor workforce (freelancer...

  • Employment Law
  • Payroll
I-9 Documents: Unexpected DHS Changes Prompt Reverification

Employers may need to reverify certain employees’ Form I-9 documents due to recent changes from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)...

  • Employment Law
OSHA: Dollar General to Improve Workplace Safety, Pay $12M

Dollar General, a nationwide discount retailer, has agreed to make comprehensive workplace safety improvements in its stores nationwide and...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.