• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Job offer revoked due to medical condition: Why it wasn’t an ADA violation

Rachel Mucha
By: Rachel Mucha
  • Share on

About the Author

Rachel writes about Human Resource management and has been a member of the HRMorning staff since 2017. She is a graduate of Ithaca College.

Show Less
Last Updated: March 7, 2022
2 minute engagement
employee posed a direct threat

Employers know that refusing to accommodate or hire a disabled employee can end up being an ADA violation.

But what happens if the disabled person poses a danger to themselves and others?

A court addressed this issue in a recent lawsuit. Here’s a breakdown of the case.

Possibility of seizures

Russell Pontinen applied for a job at United States Steel Corporation in Indiana. He was eventually offered the job at the steel plant, in which he’d be operating torches, power tools and other heavy equipment.

After making the job offer, the employer discovered that Pontinen had a seizure disorder. It had been controlled with anti-seizure medication for many years, however Pontinen decided to stop taking his medication, against the advice of his doctor. This meant Pontinen was at high risk of a seizure.

The company took an in-depth look at Pontinen’s medical history and consulted with his doctor, ultimately concluding that Pontinen would be unable to perform his job safely. The job offer was revoked, citing Pontinen posed a direct threat to himself and his colleagues.

Pontinen sued, claiming a violation of the ADA.

Put everyone at risk

The Seventh Circuit ruled in favor of the employer. It said the company investigated Pontinen’s health issues fully before making the decision. The court reiterated Pontinen’s risk of seizures was high, and the nature of the job would be very dangerous for both himself and those around him if Pontinen were to lose consciousness during work.

Pontinen tried to argue that it had been years since he’d had a seizure, but the court said that him stopping his medication increased the risk of a seizure happening at any time.

The court’s decision is in line with the ADA, which permits employers to screen out a disabled employee if there is a “risk of substantial harm … that cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable accommodation.”

Direct threat assessment

So what can employers do if they find themselves in a similar situation as Pontinen and his employer? Here’s some advice from employment law attorney Fiona Ong of the firm Shawe Rosenthal LLP.

To properly make a direct threat assessment under the ADA, an employer can require an employee to undergo a medical assessment. It can also go over the employee’s medical history and speak with their doctor.

It would be wise to make a list of the job’s essential duties and how the employee’s condition may impact those as well.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

HR Strategy and Tactics for an Uncertain Future

White Papers

Remote Work Requests Are Testing Your ADA Process, Are You Ready?

Provided by AbsenceSoft

Webinars

How Company Culture Boosts Employee Performance

White Papers

Completion Rates Aren’t a Training Strategy

Provided by Navex

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Jury Awards $22.5M Verdict in Pregnancy Accommodation Lawsuit

A remote work accommodation dispute turned into a wrongful death case with eight-figure liability. In Larkin v. Total Quality Logistics,...

  • Employment Law
6 Ways to Navigate Contingent Labor Compliance

If you’re an HR professional dealing with contingent labor, you’ve probably felt the creeping anxiety as your company takes on more con...

  • Employment Law
Compensable Travel Time Rules for Overnight Work Trips

Normally, an employee’s travel or commuting time is not compensable travel time under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. But when empl...

  • Employment Law
What is a ‘Key Employee’ Under FMLA & Why You Should Care

Even many veteran HR pros will admit that they are occasionally stumped by the intricacies of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Case...

  • Employment Law
Dual-Role Scheduling & Overtime: New DOL Opinion Letter FLSA2026-5

Does dual-role scheduling put your overtime compliance at risk? A new DOL opinion letter says it depends on the specific facts of the arran...

  • Employment Law
Fired employees file whistleblower complaints: Doggie daycare pays $50K in damages

  In Idaho, a doggie daycare facility and its former owner will pay $50,000 in general and punitive damages to resolve two former...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.