Skip to main content

Job offer revoked due to medical condition: Why it wasn’t an ADA violation

RM

By

Last updated March 7, 20222 min read
Job offer revoked due to medical condition: Why it wasn’t an ADA violation

Employers know that refusing to accommodate or hire a disabled employee can end up being an ADA violation.

But what happens if the disabled person poses a danger to themselves and others?

A court addressed this issue in a recent lawsuit. Here’s a breakdown of the case.

Possibility of seizures

Russell Pontinen applied for a job at United States Steel Corporation in Indiana. He was eventually offered the job at the steel plant, in which he’d be operating torches, power tools and other heavy equipment.

After making the job offer, the employer discovered that Pontinen had a seizure disorder. It had been controlled with anti-seizure medication for many years, however Pontinen decided to stop taking his medication, against the advice of his doctor. This meant Pontinen was at high risk of a seizure.

The company took an in-depth look at Pontinen’s medical history and consulted with his doctor, ultimately concluding that Pontinen would be unable to perform his job safely. The job offer was revoked, citing Pontinen posed a direct threat to himself and his colleagues.

Pontinen sued, claiming a violation of the ADA.

Put everyone at risk

The Seventh Circuit ruled in favor of the employer. It said the company investigated Pontinen’s health issues fully before making the decision. The court reiterated Pontinen’s risk of seizures was high, and the nature of the job would be very dangerous for both himself and those around him if Pontinen were to lose consciousness during work.

Pontinen tried to argue that it had been years since he’d had a seizure, but the court said that him stopping his medication increased the risk of a seizure happening at any time.

The court’s decision is in line with the ADA, which permits employers to screen out a disabled employee if there is a “risk of substantial harm … that cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable accommodation.”

Direct threat assessment

So what can employers do if they find themselves in a similar situation as Pontinen and his employer? Here’s some advice from employment law attorney Fiona Ong of the firm Shawe Rosenthal LLP.

To properly make a direct threat assessment under the ADA, an employer can require an employee to undergo a medical assessment. It can also go over the employee’s medical history and speak with their doctor.

It would be wise to make a list of the job’s essential duties and how the employee’s condition may impact those as well.

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]