• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law
  • Payroll

How Does a Clawback Clause Affect Overtime Calculations? What Payroll Should Know

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: July 27, 2026
3 minute engagement
Indicates calculation of bonus payments to employees, including overtime calculation
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

Not every sign-on bonus belongs in the overtime calculation – and a recent federal case out of Virginia shows why.

A fired employee filed a lawsuit against his former employer, claiming he was illegally terminated after complaining about a co-worker’s alleged use of the N-word. He later added claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state law, alleging he was “undercompensated during his employment” due to his sign-on bonus.

Details of the Sign-On Bonus

When the ex-employee was hired, he received a nondiscretionary sign-on bonus, payable within the first 30 days. His offer letter required repayment of some or all of the bonus if he left voluntarily or was terminated for violating company policies within 12 months.

Based on the provision in the offer letter, the former employee said the bonus should’ve been included when calculating his overtime rate over the 12-month period. He worked overtime during three pay periods, but his bonus wasn’t included. According to his calculations, the bonus should’ve increased his regular rate by about $2.50 per hour.

He Blames Payroll for Error in Overtime Calculations

The former employee also claimed the company acted willfully when it failed to pay him the proper overtime wages. He said the in-house payroll department processed his pay and had “complete control” over his overtime calculations, making the company responsible for FLSA compliance.

He argued employers must include nondiscretionary bonuses in an employee’s regular rate when calculating overtime. According to the complaint, the company knew or should’ve known his sign-on bonus covered a 12-month period and should’ve prorated it into his regular rate. By excluding the bonus, the company knowingly violated the FLSA or acted with reckless disregard for the law, he alleged.

Employer’s Take: Why Bonus Wasn’t Included in OT

The employer argued that the bonus didn’t need to be included in overtime calculations because the former employee received it as a lump sum during his first week of employment and didn’t work overtime during that week or the first 30 days, when the bonus was payable under the offer letter.

From the employer’s perspective, payroll made the right call.

Court Explains How Bonus Should’ve Been Applied

The court cited a federal regulation that allows employers to calculate overtime without including a bonus until its exact amount can be determined. Once the amount is known, the bonus must be allocated back to the weeks in which it was earned and included when recalculating overtime.

That rule applied here, the court said, because the clawback provision meant the employer could not know the amount of the bonus the employee was entitled to keep until the end of the 12 months or upon termination.

Moreover, the court pointed out that the former employee was fired a little over two months after his start date, so all of the bonus was repayable. Ultimately, he wasn’t entitled to any of the sign-on bonus, so the employer didn’t violate the FLSA by not incorporating the bonus into his overtime rate. Case dismissed. 

Payroll takeaways: 

  • Review sign-on bonus terms to determine when the bonus must be included in the regular rate for overtime calculations, and
  • A clawback provision may allow payroll to exclude a bonus until the employee’s entitlement to the bonus is known.

More info: Fowler v. Caesars Virginia, LLC, No. 4:24-cv-00029 (W.D. Va. 6/5/26).

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Payroll
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Harvard Business Review AI Talent Playbook

Webinars

The Screening Mistakes That Lead to Lawsuits: How to Protect Your Organization from Offer to Ongoing Monitoring

Provided by Mitratech

White Papers

The Hidden Cost of Untreated Menopause: Keep Your Most Experienced Talent at Their Best

Provided by Maven Clinic

White Papers

The Leave and Accommodations Business Impact Report

Provided by AbsenceSoft

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

Talent Management

sponsored content
AI Skills Gap: The 2026 Questions HR Leaders Are Asking, Answered

Courtesy of TRINET

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
  • HR Technology
Connecticut Adds to Growing List of State Workplace AI Laws

Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a...

  • Employment Law
$10 Million Judgment Highlights Risks of Worker Misclassification

Heads up, HR pros: Misclassifying workers as independent contractors when they are really employees can end up being an expensive mistake. ...

  • Employment Law
New Illinois NICU Leave Law: 4 Keys Payroll Needs to Know

Illinois’ Family Neonatal Intensive Care Leave Act took effect on June 1, providing employees with children in a neonatal intensive c...

  • Employment Law
Why You’ll See More Discrimination Claims and How to Handle Them | 2-Minute Video

You can expect an uptick in discrimination claims. Employees know more about discrimination and are more prepared than ever to file. And...

  • Employment Law
Is High Blood Pressure Covered Under FMLA? Getting It Right

Is high blood pressure a legitimate reason to take FMLA leave? The question came up in a case from Arkansas. Here was the scenario. A...

  • Employment Law
  • Leadership & Strategy
The Silent Warning Inside Today’s Workplaces: Harassment Prevention Strategies Aren’t Landing

Nearly a decade after #MeToo ignited a global reckoning around workplace harassment, there was hope that workplaces would look fundamentall...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.