• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Don’t mess with HR: Company pays $460K to settle age bias lawsuit

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: March 13, 2023
2 minute engagement
Employee Also Alleges Age Discrimination

An HR director received a six-figure settlement to settle her age discrimination claim. Here’s what happened:

An overseas company hired a new president to run a location in the state of Georgia. Things quickly turned problematic, the HR director said, when the company planned to implement changes that violated federal law.

And when the HR director tried to explain how anti-discrimination laws worked in the U.S., she was fired.

HR director explains age discrimination — to no avail

In 2019, Fischer Connectors, Inc., a Swiss-based national manufacturer of circular connectors used in medical devices, hired a new president for its location in the state of Georgia.

The new president and the company then made plans to “eliminate all older management and sales employees” and replace them with younger workers “under the guise of job eliminations,” an EEOC lawsuit later alleged.

The HR director, a 67-year-old, said she witnessed the company “repeatedly turning down qualified older employees in favor of less-qualified, younger employees and forcing out all older upper-management employees.” 

The HR director said she tried to explain the company’s legal obligations under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), but her message was not well received. Moreover, when she refused to “participate” in the company’s actions, she was “fired and replaced by two significantly younger individuals,” she said.

She filed an age discrimination complaint with the EEOC, and the agency sued on her behalf.

The company agreed to pay $460,000 to the former HR director to settle the dispute. It also agreed to:

  • Train all of its U.S. employees and managers on the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).
  • Distribute its ADEA policies to all employees.
  • Post a notice about federal anti-discrimination laws and employee rights in the workplace.
  • Submit to EEOC monitoring on how it handles future ADEA discrimination complaints. 

Info: Company to Pay $460K to Settle Age Discrimination Suit, 2/28/23.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Switching Background Screening Vendors: A Checklist

Provided by Mitratech

Webinars

Moving from Ping-Pong to Purpose: What Your Candidates Want From Their Next Career Move

Webinars

Beyond Compliance: Building Trust Through AI Governance in HR

Provided by Paycom

Webinars

2026 Workplace Compliance Trends to Watch

Provided by Paycom

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Background Checks: A $600K FCRA Compliance Mistake

Background checks are essential to hiring – but even small compliance missteps can lead to significant legal risk and costly settlements....

  • Employment Law
Lessons from the Hollywood strike: 3 valuable takeaways for HR

Hollywood’s latest drama – a simultaneous strike by screenwriters and actors – hasn’t been seen since 1960, before most of ...

  • Employment Law
Telework as Accommodation: Was It Required Here?

A new EEOC lawsuit is taking aim at an employer that allegedly violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by refusing to allow tele...

  • Employment Law
New NLRB ruling makes life harder for employers: Here’s how

A new NLRB decision means employers must proceed very carefully before disciplining employees who get a little heated while engaging in uni...

  • Employment Law
Hostile Work Environment: Court Upholds $300K Damages Award

A federal judge has denied SkyWest Airlines’ bid for a new trial and upheld an order that the company pay $300,000 in damages to a former...

  • Employment Law
  • HR Technology
Legal Considerations for HR Teams Using AI in the Workplace

While it’s true that AI is transforming HR, its adoption comes with significant legal challenges. So it’s crucial for HR teams ...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.