• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Don’t mess with HR: Company pays $460K to settle age bias lawsuit

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: March 13, 2023
2 minute engagement
Employee Also Alleges Age Discrimination

An HR director received a six-figure settlement to settle her age discrimination claim. Here’s what happened:

An overseas company hired a new president to run a location in the state of Georgia. Things quickly turned problematic, the HR director said, when the company planned to implement changes that violated federal law.

And when the HR director tried to explain how anti-discrimination laws worked in the U.S., she was fired.

HR director explains age discrimination — to no avail

In 2019, Fischer Connectors, Inc., a Swiss-based national manufacturer of circular connectors used in medical devices, hired a new president for its location in the state of Georgia.

The new president and the company then made plans to “eliminate all older management and sales employees” and replace them with younger workers “under the guise of job eliminations,” an EEOC lawsuit later alleged.

The HR director, a 67-year-old, said she witnessed the company “repeatedly turning down qualified older employees in favor of less-qualified, younger employees and forcing out all older upper-management employees.” 

The HR director said she tried to explain the company’s legal obligations under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), but her message was not well received. Moreover, when she refused to “participate” in the company’s actions, she was “fired and replaced by two significantly younger individuals,” she said.

She filed an age discrimination complaint with the EEOC, and the agency sued on her behalf.

The company agreed to pay $460,000 to the former HR director to settle the dispute. It also agreed to:

  • Train all of its U.S. employees and managers on the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).
  • Distribute its ADEA policies to all employees.
  • Post a notice about federal anti-discrimination laws and employee rights in the workplace.
  • Submit to EEOC monitoring on how it handles future ADEA discrimination complaints. 

Info: Company to Pay $460K to Settle Age Discrimination Suit, 2/28/23.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

What Employees Wish You Knew About Their HSA

White Papers

The FMLA Paperwork Trap: Why Manual Leave Management Is Costing You More Than Time

Provided by AbsenceSoft

White Papers

HR in 2026: Insights & Best Practices

White Papers

How Gwinnett County Strengthens Employee Wellbeing with Maven

Provided by Maven Clinic

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Benefits
  • Employment Law
Supreme Court Limits ADA Retirement Benefits Protections for Workers

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that ADA retirement benefits do not extend to retirees challenging post-employment changes – a decision ...

  • Employment Law
Trump Signs Executive Order to Block State AI Laws: What HR Needs to Know

HR teams using AI in hiring and other employment decisions are caught in the middle of a federal-state power struggle over regulation. On D...

  • Employment Law
  • Policy & Procedures
Is Remote Work a Reasonable Accommodation? 3 Best Practices

This case shows just how tricky things can get when the ADA and FMLA overlap. Here, an employee exhausted her FMLA leave and then sought an...

  • Employment Law
  • Recruiting
5 Traits to Look for Next Time You Hire a Supervisor

Like good frontline employees, every good supervisor is unique. The best supervisors come with some common traits that make them succee...

  • Employment Law
FMLA Notice Requirements: What a New Appeals Court Ruling Means for HR

What exactly are the FMLA notice requirements employees must meet before taking leave? The answer isn’t simple – and getting it wro...

  • Employment Law
You Decide: Was This Evidence Enough to Show Race Bias?

Proving unlawful race bias can be an uphill battle for employees. HR professionals can learn a lot from court decisions that say an employe...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.