• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

‘Talk to Us First’ Safety Policy Was Illegal, Federal Agency Finds

Tom D'Agostino
By: Tom D'Agostino
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

Tom D’Agostino is an attorney and legal editor who has more than 30 years of experience writing about employment law, disability law and education law trends. He earned his B.A. degree from Ramapo College of New Jersey and his J.D. from the Duquesne University School of Law. D’Agostino, who is a member of the Pennsylvania bar, is a past member of the American Bar Association’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities and the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Legal Services to Persons with Disabilities Committee. He has provided technical assistance in the production of segments for television’s ABC World News and 20/20, and he has been quoted in periodicals including USA Today. He is also a past contributing author of Legal Rights of Persons with Disabilities: An Analysis of Federal Law, which is a comprehensive two-volume treatise addressing the legal rights of people with disabilities. Tom is passionate about baseball and authentic Italian food. When not writing, he enjoys spending time with family.

Show Less
Last Updated: July 30, 2024
3 minute engagement
safety policy violated the law
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

An employer broke the law by implementing a safety policy that required employees to come to it first before going to regulatory authorities with safety concerns, the Department of Labor has determined.

As a result of the agency’s investigation, the employer will change its reporting policy and provide compensation to an affected employee.

The target of the investigation was Maersk Line Limited, which is one of the world’s leading providers of marine cargo services.

Safety Policy Was Not Followed

A seaman reported a number of safety concerns about a Maersk vessel to the U.S. Coast Guard in December of 2020.

The seaman said:

  • Gear that was used to release lifeboats was not working properly.
  • A trainee was left alone while on ship’s watch.
  • Crew members had alcohol and possibly consumed it while onboard.
  • There were leaks that needed to be repaired.
  • There were deck sockets that needed to be repaired or replaced.

The employer quickly suspended the seaman and then terminated his employment in March of 2021 because he did not follow its safety policy of notifying it before he reached out to the Coast Guard.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) determined that the termination of employment violated the federal Seaman’s Protection Act. It said seamen may report safety concerns directly to the Coast Guard and do not need to follow any company safety policy that requires them to go to their employer first.

OSHA Condemns Safety Policy

In July of 2023, the Department of Labor reported that OSHA had ordered Maersk to reinstate the seaman and to pay damages. It also ordered the employer to revise its safety policy to make it clear that employees can go straight to outside authorities to report safety issues.

Maersk challenged OSHA’s findings, and an administrative hearing was held in June of 2024.

Following the completion of the hearing, the parties entered into a settlement agreement near the start of July of 2024.

Under the agreement, Maersk agreed not to discharge or discriminate against any employee for engaging in protected activity, such as reporting a safety issue.

It also agreed to remove all negative information relating to the seaman’s termination from his personnel file and to provide a neutral employment reference upon request.

Employer Will Take Steps

The employer further agreed to:

  • Remove any existing requirement that employees notify the employer before contacting the U.S. Coast Guard with concerns that are related to safety.
  • Refrain from retaliating against any seamen to contact the Coast Guard.
  • Provide all of its supervisors with training relating to the requirements of the revised policy.
  • Distribute an OSHA fact sheet relating to the Seaman’s Protection Act to seamen about its U.S. flagged vessels for the next two years.

Under the specific terms of the settlement agreement, the employer further explicitly agreed to comply with the provisions of the federal Seaman’s Protection Act and all of its implementing regulations in the future. Nor will it discharge or discriminate against any seaman because they reasonably refuse to perform duties for reasons that are related to safety.

“Workers have the right to report safety concerns directly to authorities without fear of retaliation,” OSHA said in a press release announcing the settlement.

In addition, Maersk agreed by separate agreement to provide the affected seaman with a monetary payment.

Employees Have Option

“This case is an important affirmation that all mariners have the option to contact the U.S. Coast Guard directly for addressing a safety concern,” said Rear Admiral and Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy for the U.S. Coast Guard Wayne Arguin. “Safety requires a team approach. The size, complexity and importance of the marine transportation system demand that everyone work together to prevent casualties and minimize supply chain disruptions.”

The agreement expressly disclaims any admission by Maersk that its prior safety policy violated any provisions of the law.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

Upskill, Reskill and Retain: How to Future-Proof Your Workforce

Provided by PAYCOM

White Papers

State of Women’s and Family Health Benefits 2026

Provided by Maven Clinic

White Papers

Recognition Is a System, Not a Moment

Provided by Terryberry

White Papers

2026 Employee Engagement and Retention Report

Provided by Achievers

SPONSORED CONTENT

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Trump’s EEOC Changes Explained: What HR Leaders Need to Know

President Trump made significant changes to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) when he returned to the White House.  ...

  • Employment Law
Fired over a tampon: Jury awards woman $85K — then court tacks on an additional $258K

Even if a six-figure payout doesn’t make you cringe, the details of this lawsuit probably will. A woman in Virginia was fired for R...

  • Employment Law
Jury Awards $105K to Male Employee in Sex Discrimination Case

In Arkansas, a jury has awarded more than $100,000 to a male surgical technician who filed an EEOC charge alleging he was discriminated aga...

  • Employment Law
Driver Misclassification Settlement Includes $2.2M for Back Wages

New Jersey has reached an employee misclassification settlement with STG Logistics over allegations that the company and its predecessor mi...

  • Employment Law
New OSHA Rule Lets Union Reps Participate in Safety Inspections

A new OSHA rule – the so-called “walkaround” rule – clarifies that employees may designate a non-employee third party, such as a un...

  • Employment Law
Inadequate training can support race bias claim, court says

Race bias claims can be based on inadequate training, a new ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit says. In this case,...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.