• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Jury Awards $105K to Male Employee in Sex Discrimination Case

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: September 4, 2026
2 minute engagement
EEOC lawsuit alleged sex discrimination
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

In Arkansas, a jury has awarded more than $100,000 to a male surgical technician who filed an EEOC charge alleging he was discriminated against because of his sex. 

The six-figure verdict is a reminder that federal Title VII protects all employees from sex discrimination in the workplace.

Employee Says Job Duties Were Limited Based on Gender 

The surgical technician worked for Northwest Arkansas Hospitals, LLC, d/b/a Northwest Medical Center-Bentonville. 

According to the technician, two female obstetricians in the labor and delivery unit prohibited him from performing most of the duties he was hired for because he’s a man. 

The technician said he complained and escalated those concerns to the C-suite, but the hospital failed to follow its own anti-discrimination policy and did not intervene to end the discrimination. 

He filed an EEOC charge, and the agency conducted an investigation. 

Was It Sex Discrimination?

In the EEOC’s view, the alleged conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex discrimination at work. After attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement, the EEOC filed a lawsuit on the technician’s behalf.

At trial, a former company director testified that the technician was a victim of the hospital’s culture of discrimination. 

The jury returned a verdict for the EEOC, awarding $5,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages to the surgical technician.

The EEOC said it plans to petition the court for injunctive relief, including requiring the hospital to conduct training to prevent future sex discrimination, and will submit a bill of costs to be paid by the defendant.

Responding to Employee Complaints

How an employer handles a complaint can influence whether employees trust the reporting process. Recent research from Traliant found that employees place significant weight on how employers respond to workplace complaints. 

When an employee raises a discrimination concern, employers should promptly acknowledge it, follow established workplace investigation processes, and document the employer’s response and outcome.

More info: EEOC Press Release

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

How Employee Spending is Changing the Benefits Landscape

Webinars

Is Your PEO Still Paying Off? What’s Changed Since You Signed Up

Provided by Asure Software

White Papers

Only 20% of HR Teams Feel Very Confident in Their Leave Compliance

Webinars

Upskill, Reskill and Retain: How to Future-Proof Your Workforce

Provided by PAYCOM

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

Talent Management

sponsored content
AI Skills Gap: The 2026 Questions HR Leaders Are Asking, Answered

Courtesy of TRINET

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Feds to NJ employer: ‘That job termination violates the ADA’

A newly filed lawsuit says a New Jersey nursing home’s job termination of a longtime worker violated the Americans with Disabilities ...

  • Employment Law
FMLA For Expectant Fathers: When Leave Does – and Doesn’t – Apply

When are expectant fathers entitled to FMLA leave? And what exactly are they entitled to? What about FMLA leave for new fathers? A new ...

  • Employment Law
Obesity and the ADA: Does alleged fat-shaming at work prove discrimination?

Does obesity count as a disability protected under the law? That’s the question a Connecticut court recently faced. An employee su...

  • Employment Law
Sexual assault at work: McDonald’s franchisee agrees to pay $4.4M to teen worker

Last fall, the DOL announced that it would increase civil money penalties for child labor violations. And an egregious case out of weste...

  • Employment Law
How Broad Is The ADA’s Ban on Retaliation? Court Weighs In

A new decision from a federal appeals court has an important message for HR pros about the scope of the ADA’s ban on retaliation. The...

  • Employment Law
New Supreme Court Term: 6 Employment Cases to Watch

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024-25 term opened this week – and several employment issues are already on the docket.  Here are six...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.