Skip to main content

Porn at Work: Was Worker Fired for Complaining About It?

TD

By

Last updated November 6, 20243 min read
Porn at Work: Was Worker Fired for Complaining About It?

How much porn at work is OK to watch? We hope your policy is zero. 

And as this lawsuit shows, the reasons for taking that policy seriously don’t just include cutting down on distractions and keeping the focus on work. They also include protecting your agency from a lawsuit.

A former police sergeant in Florida has sued Miami Beach, the police chief and a supervisor. She says she was fired after eight years on the force for complaining about sexual misconduct at work including porn at work – and filing an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charge when her complaint was ignored.

Sergeant objects to porn at work

She says she and the union reported this to Chief Richard Clements, who allegedly did nothing to stop it.

Jessica Guasto’s suit claims Miami Beach Police Department (MBPD) co-workers and supervisors made sexually explicit comments to her and watched porn at work on their phones. In addition to the porn at work allegation, she said they discussed penis enlargements and made cracks about female supervisors getting promotions for sexual favors.

In May 2020, the city told Guasto and her husband, also an MBPD officer, it was investigating them for being outside the city limits while on duty – which she says typically doesn’t trigger severe penalties.

But after she filed a sex bias charge with the EEOC over other officers’ offensive conduct, including viewing porn at work, she claims the city called her to a meeting. The meeting included the city attorney, the internal affairs commander and the city’s human resources director – and the chief threatened to fire her for the charge under investigation if she didn’t agree to a settlement.

In return, the city promised to properly address her harassment report.

It required her to dismiss her EEOC charge, agree to a 160-hour suspension, and sign a last-chance agreement that gave the chief discretion to fire her for any violation of city or MBPD policy or procedure.

Guasto says similarly situated male officers committed similar or worse misconduct and were not terminated.

Promptly fired after signing last-chance agreement

Guasto says she signed the settlement, hoping to save her job and have her complaint properly addressed – but she says it wasn’t.

Instead, on her first day back at work – a 16-hour shift due to required overtime – her supervisor was a lieutenant who she says pursued her romantically when they were both patrol officers and then turned on her when she rejected him.

She says the shift passed without incident – but he submitted an allegation of employee misconduct, accusing her of charges including unbecoming conduct, insubordination and neglect of duty.

Advertisement

Beacon from HRMorning: HR department of one? Beacon reads the law. You make the call. Try Beacon free.

He alleged she didn’t complete assignments and lied about it; didn’t respond to her assigned area; and didn’t monitor the police radio. He also insinuated she was sleeping on duty.

Guasto’s suit says the allegations were false and she believes he made them because he knew she could be fired for any policy violation.

The city fired her.

What her lawsuit alleges

Based on the alleged porn at work and other alleged offensive conduct, Guasto has sued the city for sex discrimination and retaliation.

She has also brought a Fourteenth Amendment sex discrimination claim against the chief and a federal claim of conspiracy to violate civil rights against both the chief and the lieutenant.

She has also filed contract claims against the city, alleging it breached the settlement agreement.

As remedies, she has asked the court to order the MBPD to:

  • institute policies, practices and training to protect employees from bias
  • award her back pay and the value of her lost employment benefits, and
  • either reinstate her with full benefits or award her front pay.

She has also asked the court to award her money damages for emotional distress, humiliation, embarrassment and loss of reputation – and attorneys’ fees.

Complaint in Guasto v. City of Miami Beach, Florida, No. 1:22-cv-21004-DPG (S.D. Fla. filed 4/2/22).

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]