• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Suit paints ugly picture of anti-Muslim bias at work

Tom D'Agostino
By: Tom D'Agostino
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

Tom D’Agostino is an attorney and legal editor who has more than 30 years of experience writing about employment law, disability law and education law trends. He earned his B.A. degree from Ramapo College of New Jersey and his J.D. from the Duquesne University School of Law. D’Agostino, who is a member of the Pennsylvania bar, is a past member of the American Bar Association’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities and the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Legal Services to Persons with Disabilities Committee. He has provided technical assistance in the production of segments for television’s ABC World News and 20/20, and he has been quoted in periodicals including USA Today. He is also a past contributing author of Legal Rights of Persons with Disabilities: An Analysis of Federal Law, which is a comprehensive two-volume treatise addressing the legal rights of people with disabilities. Tom is passionate about baseball and authentic Italian food. When not writing, he enjoys spending time with family.

Show Less
Last Updated: August 9, 2021
2 minute engagement
Worker Says Harassment Was Severe
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

A new lawsuit accuses a Cedar City, Utah, car dealership of violating Title VII by engaging in religious discrimination.

The suit says the dealership denied a Muslim employee religious accommodations. It also says the dealership fired the employee because he complained. 

Automotive technician Allan Goodson alleges that his manager denied his request to take two 5-10 minute prayer breaks during his shift. The employer let others take short breaks, he says.

Goodson says the employer also refused to let him attend Friday prayer services. Those services lasted for an hour. He says he proposed to work half days on Fridays or have the day off. He asserts that he also offered to shift his hours and work extended days Monday through Thursday so he could take the hour on Fridays.

Others treated differently?

The employer allowed other employees to work longer days Monday through Thursday so they could have all or part of their Friday off, the suit says.

The suit says co-workers and managers subjected Goodson to a hostile work environment. It asserts that the dealership fired Goodson after he complained about the alleged unlawful treatment.

Some of the allegations paint an especially ugly picture. Goodson says other employees asked him if he was a terrorist. It asserts that they asked him where his “magic carpet” was. And it says he was asked if he “blew up any buildings over the weekend.”

The suit alleges that the employer violated Title VII by refusing to accommodate Goodson’s religious beliefs. It says the employer treated him differently based on his religion and subjected him to a hostile work environment. It also says it retaliated against him.

Plaintiff wants injunction

The complaint seeks an injunction banning the employer from discriminating against its employees based on their religion.

Woodson also wants the employer to institute a policy that lets Muslim employees take short prayer breaks.

The suit also seeks compensatory and punitive damages.

Goodson is represented by the CAIR Legal Defense Fund and the law firm of Stringberg Scholnick Birch Hallam Harstad Thorne.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

The New Rules of Engagement: Rethinking How Employees Connect to Work

Provided by Inspirus

White Papers

Healthcare Affordability Pulse

Provided by HealthEquity

Webinars

Background Screening in 2027: What Changes January 1 and How to Get Ready

Provided by Mitratech

White Papers

TriNet – The Total Economic Impact of TriNet PEO (Forrester TEI Report)

Provided by TriNet

SPONSORED CONTENT

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
$10 Million Judgment Highlights Risks of Worker Misclassification

Heads up, HR pros: Misclassifying workers as independent contractors when they are really employees can end up being an expensive mistake. ...

  • Employment Law
Forced to resign? Cop says video was ‘satire’ and a ‘parody of BLM protests’

The Eighth Circuit revived a First Amendment retaliation claim filed by a police officer who said he was forced to resign over a video that...

  • Employment Law
The 1 Ironclad Response to This ADA Accommodation Demand

When an ADA accommodation claim is based on the denial of a request to be excused from performing a specific job function, there’s one de...

  • Employment Law
Worker Death: OSHA Points Finger at Employer

A worker death led to a finding by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) that an employer should pay $177,453 in penalti...

  • Employment Law
Telework as Accommodation: Was It Required Here?

A new EEOC lawsuit is taking aim at an employer that allegedly violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by refusing to allow tele...

  • Employment Law
Employer Blamed for Ugly Injury: Worker Suffers Burns to Face

The Department of Labor has determined that an employer is to blame for injuries suffered by a worker whose face was burned as he was clean...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.