• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

New OSHA Fine: $202K for Recycling Plant’s Repeat Violations

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: October 21, 2024
2 minute engagement
OSHA Seeks $1M in Penalties for Air Safety Violations

A recycling plant in Wisconsin faces more than $202,000 in penalties after OSHA found repeat violations at a follow-up inspection.

The case provides yet another example of how exposure to chemical hazards can be expensive for employers.

Ongoing Chemical Hazards Found

In April 2024, federal OSHA safety investigators visited Universal Recycling Technologies LLC, a recycling company based in Janesville, WI, for a follow-up inspection.

There, the investigators noted that employees dismantling cathode ray tubes from older TVs were exposed to unsafe levels of lead and cadmium – even though the company had been cited for the same violations in April 2023.

In OSHA’s view, the company failed to implement adequate engineering controls and did not keep surfaces as free as practicable from lead and cadmium accumulations.

“Chronic overexposures to these toxic metals may cause severe damage to blood-forming, nervous, urinary and reproductive systems,” Chad Greenwood, OSHA Area Director in Madison, WI, said in a statement. “Universal Recycling Technologies cannot solely rely on personal protective equipment as the primary source of protection. The company must focus on continuous improvement of engineering controls to reduce employee exposures to hazardous air contaminants.”

OSHA Proposes Six-Figure Fine

The agency cited the company for two repeat violations, six serious violations and one other-than-serious violation. It proposed $202,820 in penalties.

Specifically, OSHA investigators found the employer failed to: 

  • provide biological monitoring of employees for overexposure every six months
  • collect samples for representative full-shift exposures to both lead and cadmium
  • ensure workers remove their protective clothing contaminated with lead and cadmium after their shifts and leave it at the workplace
  • require workers exposed to lead and cadmium to shower at the end of their shift
  • establish a regulation area to reduce the spread of contamination when employees are exposed to lead or cadmium over the permissible exposure limit, and
  • train employees on the additive effects of lead and cadmium.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

Pandemic-Proof Your HR Processes

White Papers

TriNet AI in HR eGuide 2026

White Papers

Ultimate Guide to Selecting a Contingent Employer of Record (EOR)

Provided by Magnit

Webinars

Improve Your Hiring with Background Screenings – Intellicorp page

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
OSHA: Animal Food Plant Faces $166K Fine for 24 Violations

OSHA inspectors have determined an animal food producer in Wisconsin exposed employees to combustible dust hazards and cited the employer f...

  • Employment Law
FMLA Leave: 6 Legal Ways to Deny Reinstatement

When conducting company layoffs or reorganizations, some employers may face this legally risky situation: denying reinstatement to an emplo...

  • Employment Law
9 Potential Changes to Workers’ Comp Laws That Might Surprise HR

Revisions to workers’ comp laws could take effect this year and next, promising a more equitable and responsive system for injured em...

  • Employment Law
Worker Badly Hurt – So Why Is Workers’ Comp Claim in Doubt?

An appeals court in Illinois upheld a decision to award workers’ comp benefits to a traveling employee who was hurt before he got on the ...

  • Employment Law
Black workers weren’t recalled after pandemic layoff: Hooters pays $650K

Hooters of Louisiana, LLC has agreed to pay $650,000 to settle a race discrimination and retaliation suit, the Equal Opportunity Employment...

  • Employment Law
Get ready: Supreme Court raises the bar on religious accommodation duty

As we predicted, the U.S. Supreme Court has expanded the duty of employers to provide religious accommodation to employees under Title VII....

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.