• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Mandatory prayer meetings: Employer pays $50K to settle EEOC lawsuit

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: November 14, 2024
2 minute engagement

When it comes to religious expression at work, just how far can a company go before crossing a line?

For example, earlier this summer, a California company brought in a priest to hear “confessions” of workers who cooperated with a DOL investigation. That didn’t go over well with the agency — and it resulted in a six-figure payout.

Here’s another instance of religious activity at work that caught the attention of the feds — the EEOC, in this case. Here’s what happened:

Daily mandatory prayer meetings

This case involves Aurora Renovations and Developments, LLC, d/b/a Aurora Pro Services, a North Carolina-based residential home service and repair company, and two employees who were fired.

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, the company required all employees to attend daily prayer meetings that included Bible readings, Christian devotionals and solicitation of prayer requests from employees. The company owner led the meetings and often took roll prior, allegedly reprimanding the employees who did not attend, the EEOC claimed.

Workers object on religious grounds

In the fall of 2020, a construction worker who identifies as an atheist asked to be excused from the prayer portion of the meeting. The company denied the religious accommodation request, cut the employee’s pay and then fired him, the suit claimed. A few months later, a customer service representative stopped attending the prayer meetings, saying they did not align with her religious beliefs. In January 2021, the company fired her.

EEOC: Conduct violates Title VII

Under Title VII, employers may not discriminate against employees and applicants based on their religious views. Refusing to provide the employees with religious accommodations violated Title VII, the EEOC alleged. It filed a religious discrimination and retaliation suit on behalf of the workers.

The company agreed to pay $50,000 to resolve the suit. Under a three-year consent decree, the company: 

  • Is prohibited from discriminating and retaliating against employees in violation of Title VII
  • Must adopt and implement new anti-discrimination, non-retaliation, and religious accommodation policies, and
  • Must provide training to all managers and employees, including the owner.

Info: Aurora Pro Services Pays $50K to Settle Religious Discrimination and Retaliation Suit, 8/2/23.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

Top HR Trends and Priorities for 2026

Provided by Paycom

Webinars

The Secret to Achieving Peak Performance From Every Employee

Webinars

How to Access Benefits for Your Small Business

Provided by TriNet

Webinars

Benefits that Attract Millennials for the Long Term

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
DOL Finds Wage and Hour Violations: Pizza Company Pays $409K

A Little Caesars franchisee will pay $409,457 for federal wage and hour violations, the Department of Labor (DOL) recently announced. Th...

  • Employment Law
What’s in a Whisper? Not Illegal Harassment, Court Says

Sometimes, things can get uncomfortable or awkward at work. But to cross the line into illegal harassment, there needs to be something more...

  • Employment Law
OSHA Backs Driver Who Reported Safety Issues

A truck driver was illegally fired for reporting legitimate safety issues, the Department of Labor (DOL) has determined. OSHA has o...

  • Employment Law
Non-Compete Agreement Ban: What The Latest Court Ruling Means

A second federal district court has preliminarily enjoined enforcement of the FTC’s pending ban on non-compete agreements, finding that t...

  • Employment Law
Stroke Leads to Job Termination: FMLA Violation?

A federal court refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed by an employee who was fired after taking FMLA leave to recover from a stroke. The ru...

  • Employment Law
  • Payroll
New Veterans Law Makes USERRA Compliance More Crucial

Employers should be aware the federal law that protects veterans and service members has been amended by a new law, making the stakes highe...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.